For nearly two years, my colleagues in the Assembly Minority Conference and I have been imploring the Farm Laborers Wage Board to keep the overtime threshold for farm workers at 60 hours per week. With the board set to make its recommendations to Gov. Kathy Hochul next month, I am calling on the governor, once again, to wholly reject the board’s plan to reduce the threshold to 40 hours.

Despite numerous public hearings, hours of testimony by farmers — those with firsthand knowledge of the disastrous implications that reducing the overtime threshold could have on the industry — and feedback from other experts in the field, recent reports indicate Gov. Hochul is prepared to accept the board’s recommendations, due in September. The 2022-23 New York State Budget, passed in April, included tax credits for farmers to help offset higher labor costs. One could ask, “Was it the state’s plan to increase the threshold all along, regardless of the feedback the Wage Board received?”

Already a struggling industry, New York’s agriculture sector lost more than 2,000 farms from 2012-2017, according to 2019 USDA Census data. Still reeling from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York’s growers are also struggling with supply chain and labor shortages and even more recently, rising fuel and supply costs. Now is not the time to put more strain on New York’s farmers.

As family farms across the state are trying to stay afloat, keep their costs low and remain competitive, many fear they will have to relocate to another state if New York adopts the board’s capped overtime hours. Food for thought — New York state is home to about 30,000 farms that produce fruits, vegetables, milk ,and other dairy products for local farm stands and grocery stores, schools, and national retailers. The state’s agricultural industry — generating about $5.3 billion annually — is the lifeblood of many upstate communities and the board’s proposal could have irreparable, devastating ramifications.

Simply put, reducing the farm-overtime threshold to 40 hours a week would be irresponsible. To preserve our state’s family farms — many of which have been operational for generations — I am again calling on the governor and the state labor commissioner to do right by these hardworking men and women, and reject the Wage Board’s recommendations, keep the overtime threshold at 60 hours, and save the state’s agriculture industry. After all, no farms, no food.                                                             

William (Will) A. Barclay, 53, Republican, is the New York Assembly minority leader and represents the 120th New York Assembly District, which encompasses most of Oswego County, including the cities of Oswego and Fulton, as well as the town of Lysander in Onondaga County and town of Ellisburg in Jefferson County. 

Some of the United States’ most important relationships are with other countries in the Americas. They often receive less attention than they deserve. These relationships can be challenging, but there are few challenges more important than working effectively with our neighbors. 

The promise and challenge of forging meaningful collaboration with Mexico and the nations of Central and South America and the Caribbean were on display in June at the Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles. This was the ninth summit and the first hosted by the U.S. since the inaugural summit in 1994. The meeting, attended by 23 heads of state and other government and private-sector leaders, produced important dialogue and agreements. But the progress was sometimes overshadowed by controversy, including disagreements over who would be invited and who would attend. 

And that’s a shame, because the vast area that we call Latin America needs and deserves serious focus. A region that has on occasion suffered from a lack of strong leadership, it always seems to be on the cusp of turning the corner but never quite makes it. These nations are lands of real promise, with talented people, rich history and great natural assets. But many have been plagued with unstable or corrupt governance, economic stagnation and polarized politics. There is always a sense, in much of Latin America, of great societies waiting to be born. 

The triennial Summit of the Americas is a chance for leaders from across the hemisphere to work on shared issues and concerns, but politics and conflict seem inevitable. This year, Mexico’s president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, boycotted to protest the U.S. decision not to invite the autocratic rulers of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The Mexican president did send representatives to the summit and met with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House on July 12. 

In 2018, Donald Trump canceled a trip to Argentina for the summit and sent Vice President Mike Pence. The decision upset some leaders and reinforced the sense that Trump didn’t care about the region except as a target for his rhetoric about illegal immigration. 

There’s also a lot of history that contributes to distrust and can feed anti-American views. In the past, U.S. troops occupied several countries in Latin America. The CIA has meddled in the affairs of others. We have had an economic embargo of Cuba for 60 years. And, of course, the U.S. secretly funded anti-government fighters in Nicaragua in the 1980s in the Iran-Contra affair. 

Despite that history, leaders and diplomats produced agreements or action plans on important issues in the 2022 summit. They created a plan for health, focused on strengthening systems and preparing for pandemics. They agreed to an economic-prosperity plan with an emphasis on trade, supply chains, and clean-energy jobs. And the leaders agreed on actions to respond to climate change, a critical issue for Caribbean nations threatened by rising sea levels and more powerful storms. 

Importantly, the summit produced a joint declaration on migration, perhaps the region’s most-urgent issue. We Americans tend to notice migrants when they try to cross the Mexico-U.S. border. In fact, many migrants fleeing poverty, gang violence, and political unrest pass through or seek to settle in several countries in the region, including Mexico, Costa Rica, Belize, and Colombia. 

The summit’s statements and agreements look good on paper, but the proof will be in the implementation. This will take cooperation and persistence, and it’s an area where U.S. leadership can make a difference. President Biden told summit participants, “None of us will be able to fully realize our ambition for the region on our own.” That’s true the world over, but it’s doubly true of the U.S. and its neighbors in the Americas.        

Lee Hamilton, 91, is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years (1965-1999), representing a district in south-central Indiana.