I was pleased to co-sponsor legislation that aims to draw more businesses to Central New York.  In March, the New York Assembly unanimously passed legislation that will expand the foreign trade zone.  The Senate also passed this bill and it awaits Governor Cuomo’s review. The legislation would expand the foreign trade zone, established at Syracuse Hancock International Airport, to include Oswego, Cayuga and Madison counties.

This legislation aims to incentivize international trade and create jobs and investment here, rather than abroad. In certain cases, businesses face tariffs (taxes on imports or exports) that penalize companies for making their product in the United States.  Foreign trade zones aim to eliminate some of these tariffs and provide advantages to domestic manufacturers.  

I am hopeful the governor signs this legislation into law.  It would broaden possibilities for more manufacturers to locate in our area and strengthen our region as we seek to add jobs to the local economy.  

When companies consider sites to expand or relocate, they have to consider the cost of everything, including taxes. A foreign trade zone would provide our region with an advantage. Expanding such zones would be an asset to our region moving forward in our global economy.             

William (Will) A. Barclay is the Republican representative of the 124th New York Assembly District, which encompasses parts of Oswego and Onondaga counties, including Oswego, Fulton, Camillus, and Skaneateles. Contact him at barclaw@assembly.state.ny.us, or (315) 598-5185.

I hear it all the time. Our region was once the manufacturing hub of America, which created wealth and employment. Our children remained in the area because of the abundant opportunities and family ties.

No more. Today we have lost our industrial base and replaced it with institutions of higher education and health-care facilities.

A glance at The Business Journal’s Book of Lists from 1993 confirms the rapid transformation. Two decades ago, manufacturing powerhouses like Carrier; Oneida, Ltd.; New Venture Gear; Syracuse China; J.J. Pietrafesa; and Syroco filled the pages of the area’s largest companies. A review of the 2012 Book of Lists “largest companies” is headed by Upstate Medical University, Cornell University, United Health Systems, Faxton St. Luke’s, Syracuse University, and Binghamton University. Of the first 25 on the current list, only four companies are manufacturers.

The despondency over the loss of our local economy reminds me of how America must have bemoaned the loss of our rural way of life. In 1900, half of all our citizens still lived on farms in order to feed the other half. Today, the ranks of our farmers represent less than 2 percent of the population, but the agricultural community not only feeds all of America but also the rest of the world. I’m not aware that anybody still lies awake at night bemoaning the transformation.

While large institutions of education and health care, better known as “eds and meds,” occupy the ranks of the area’s largest employers, our region today also supports a beehive of activity of companies which drive the new economy. Central New York, the Mohawk Valley, Greater Binghamton, the Finger Lakes, and the North Country encompass hundreds of mid-size companies, which are growing rapidly both in revenue and in employment. Names like Bankers Healthcare Group, BlueRock Energy, Byrne Dairy, Agro-Farma, Upstate Shredding, Polaris, PPC, and Usherwood are examples of dynamic companies that are driving the growth.

Because most of these new companies are privately held, they often operate under the radar, unknown not just to the local citizenry but also to the business community. No longer — it’s time to shine a spotlight on the new economy. On July 20, The Business Journal will release the first, comprehensive listing of the largest 500 companies in a 16-county region surrounding Syracuse. The publication is designed to highlight those firms that represent half of the area’s GDP and half of its employment.

Taking a page from the annual Fortune 500, we have dubbed the new publication the Business Journal 500. The Business Journal 500 will contain an alphabetical listing of the companies with valuable information about each company’s size and its key management team. The publication will also contain cross-reference lists of the companies in descending order by annual revenue and by number of employees.

The information contained in the Business Journal 500 is compiled by our staff of researchers, reporters, and editors, who update the information continually. The publication includes all corporations, both for-profit and nonprofit, which are headquartered in the area or which have a substantial presence.

The Business Journal 500 tells an important part of the story of what happened to our regional economy. We are convinced that the community will find it a valuable resource of companies which range in size from multi-billion dollar entities to those generating less than $20 million.

It’s not often that we toot our own horn at The Business Journal, but the Business Journal 500 heralds a new direction in our continuing commitment to gather and disseminate valuable news and information about the business community. July 20 is the start of a new annual publication. We trust you will find it valuable as a resource in explaining our vibrant, regional economy.    

Norman Poltenson is publisher of The Central New York Business Journal. Contact him at npoltenson@cnybj.com

Here is a good question that arose during the Supreme Court presentations on Obamacare. Is health care a right? You know, like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Like the rights spelled out in our Bill of Rights?

More to the point: Should it be free? After all, some folks cannot afford health care. If they cannot afford it, it ought to be free to them, right? Public education is. Because we figure that education is a right. So, should health care — bottom line — be free?

Suppose a person has no money. But she has the right to health care. Does that include a heart transplant? At a humungous cost? If not, why not? I can think of any number of procedures and treatments that will cost many hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep her alive. Is she entitled to them? How about a new hip at age 60? At 70? At 80? Is there a cutoff, when a “right” no longer exists?

Recently, students broke into a meeting of administrators at a California college. They demanded free college education. No fees. No tuition. Higher education is their right, they told the world. There are many who agree. College should be as free as public high school, they say.

I wonder. What if the guy wants to pursue a degree in playground supervising? (Some big college football players get such degrees.) Should he get a free four years? Wait, a free six years? Too many college kids take that long these days.

And if the idea is that education is a right and therefore free, how about master’s degrees? And if they are free, why stop there? Some brainy people have two or three master’s degrees. Should they be free? A master’s degree often paves the way for a doctorate. Any reason why we should charge for this? If education is a right, why stop there?

Food, of course, is a right. Lots of people believe that. Food is so much of a right that we the people feed lunch to millions of students every day. We feed breakfast to millions. As well as afternoon snacks. And we dole out billions of dollars in food stamps.

If food is a right, why don’t we have government simply open up grocery stores and hand it out? Why bother with all the red tape associated with food stamps? Government could buy Walmart.

We could locate the Walmarts in the middle of the free housing. The free housing the government provided. Once we agreed that shelter is an absolute right. Whenever anyone needed shelter, he could drop down to the nearest housing office and pick up the keys to an apartment.

As long as we are handing out rights, surely the right to transport is a biggie. You must be able to move from point to point. That being the case, should we declare all trains, subways, buses, and taxis free? As a right? Where those services won’t work, should we hand out cars?

I am not being cynical. Just asking some questions. The main question being: When it comes to our rights, where do we draw the line? Should some surgeries and treatments be free, but not all of them? Should health care be free to some, but not others?

Think about that. Why should my hip surgery be free while your kidney transplant is not? 

Lastly, who should make such decisions? Who should decide what is a right and what is not? Who should decide who is entitled to such rights and who is not? 

From Tom…as in Morgan.   

Tom Morgan writes about financial and other subjects from his home near Oneonta, in addition to his radio shows and new TV show. For more information about him, visit his website at www.tomasinmorgan.com