Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Finger Lakes firm launches new wind-turbine design
GENESEO — A Finger Lakes business has begun selling a new style of wind turbine it believes will eliminate the complaints and issues common with traditional wind turbines. Sky Wolf Wind Turbines, founded in 2010 by Gerald Brock, offers turbines that are smaller, quieter, minimize the risk of throwing a blade or ice chunks, and […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
GENESEO — A Finger Lakes business has begun selling a new style of wind turbine it believes will eliminate the complaints and issues common with traditional wind turbines.
Sky Wolf Wind Turbines, founded in 2010 by Gerald Brock, offers turbines that are smaller, quieter, minimize the risk of throwing a blade or ice chunks, and are better at harnessing the wind’s power, Brock contends.
“I developed a wind turbine that meets all the criticism of conventional wind-turbine technology,” and allays that criticism, Brock, Sky Wolf’s president, says.
A traditional wind turbine averages about 140 feet in height, requires about an acre of land for its structure, and can collect wind energy from winds starting at about 7 miles per hour, according to Brock.
A Sky Wolf turbine edges out traditional turbines in all three of those areas, Brock stipulates. First, his turbines are just 30 feet high. Second, they require just a 10-foot by 10-foot piece of land. And third, they start collecting energy in winds of just 5.5 miles per hour, he says. His claims, he states, are backed up by a test turbine Sky Wolf installed and operates at TSS Foam Industries Corp. in Caledonia (Livingston County). A live video feed of that turbine in action is available on the company’s website, www.skywolfwindturbines.com.
With those advantages, Brock has launched sales of his turbine with his eye initially on the upstate New York market. The Great Lakes region, in particular, is well suited for his turbines, but any area that has a good steady wind has potential, Brock says. He could also see municipalities, sports facilities, golf courses, school districts, farms, and other businesses benefitting from what Sky Wolf turbines have to offer.
“For a business, this really makes common sense,” Brock says. Businesses may be eligible for benefits under the federal Modified Accelerated Cost-Recovery System (MACRS), which provides corporate depreciation benefits for a variety of “green” systems to eligible commercial, industrial, and agricultural businesses.
While his turbines are more costly than a conventional turbine, their efficiency combined with the MACRS benefits, mean the system could pay for itself in three to five years, Brock contends. While he didn’t detail the exact cost of one of his Sky Wolf turbines, Brock did say that selling 50 units would generate about $5 million in revenue for the company.
In 2014, the company’s first full year of sales, Brock hopes to reach $7 million in sales. To launch its sales efforts, Sky Wolf has begun advertising in print media around the state, including the Rochester area and Central New York. Sky Wolf is also working with Better Power, Inc. of Rochester as a distributor and ABB, a Switzerland–based automation and energy technology company with a Latham office, to search out potential target markets.
Headquartered at 156 Court St. in Geneseo, Sky Wolf employs four people besides Brock. His son Jesse Brock serves as operations manager while his daughter Amy Brock is the company’s corporate secretary and office manager. In addition, Sky Wolf employs an electrical engineer, Aaron Christ, and a mechanical engineer, Raymond Fiore.
Contact The Business Journal at news@cnybj.com
Canal Corp. works with Utica-area company to test electric-powered boats
UTICA — The New York State Canal Corporation is testing the water with electric-powered boats, thanks, in part, to funding from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). Landover, Md.–based New West Technologies, LLC, which has an office in Yorkville, received $234,000 to
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
UTICA — The New York State Canal Corporation is testing the water with electric-powered boats, thanks, in part, to funding from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT).
Landover, Md.–based New West Technologies, LLC, which has an office in Yorkville, received $234,000 to test out a battery-electric propulsion system in a Canal Corp. work boat based in Utica.
The boat is one of a fleet of about 20 diesel-powered boats along the New York State Canal System that ferry personnel and equipment, do some light towing, and are generally used to maintain canal operations.
The problem with the boats is that the engines are getting old — many are upwards of 20 years old — and are not at all efficient or environmentally friendly, says Russell Owens, senior project engineer/manager at New West. On top of that, “diesel prices keep going up and up and up,” making it more and more costly to operate the fleet, he adds.
New West and the Canal Corp. will tear out the old diesel engine in one of the boats and replace it with the greener battery-electric system and then monitor the boat’s performance to see if it’s feasible to convert other boats in the fleet to a battery-electric system.
New West is currently evaluating two potential systems to install in the boat, and hope to be able to install the system before the end of this year. Next spring, the Canal Corp. should be able to launch the boat with the new system on board with New West collecting data during operations.
New West prepared for the project by outfitting the boat during this past work season with data collectors so the company could learn how the boat was used and what its power requirements were, Owens says. Once the boat launches with the battery-electric system, new data-collection equipment will monitor its activity, while the old data-collection equipment runs on one of the other diesel powered boats. While it won’t give New West an exact apples-to-apples comparison, it should give enough points of reference for New West and the Canal Corp. to determine if it’s feasible to outfit additional boats at some point.
Ultimately, if the project is successful, there are more than just the 20 maintenance boats that could benefit, says Joseph Tario, senior project manager of transportation research at NYSERDA. The Canal Corp. actually has a fleet of about 300 boats total, and there are other organizations that could benefit from more efficient marine technology, including the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation, which operates a fleet, and even county sheriff’s offices that operate fleets.
The goal of the entire program, Tario says, is not just to look at improving outdated technology by installing more efficient options but also to plan ahead enough so that this new technology makes sense for years to come.
“We’re always five to 10 years ahead of the real world,” he says.
This program in particular aims to reduce the state’s energy consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions. All told, NYSDOT funded $695,000 and NYSERDA funded $484,000 to 11 businesses, non-profits, and research institutions to promote this effort. The projects leverage an additional $700,000 in recipient cost-sharing.
Specific aims include reducing the number of single-occupancy vehicles on the road, promote mass or alternative forms of transit, improve fuel efficiency by coordinating traffic signals in response to real-time traffic conditions, promote bicycle- and car-sharing programs, and evaluate freight-delivery strategies and vehicles for congested urban areas.
According to NYSERDA, transportation consumes three quarters of all petroleum used in the state and is responsible for 40 percent of the greenhouse gases emitted.
Contact The Business Journal at news@cnybj.com
NY Biomass Energy Alliance supports willow growers for sustainable energy
GEDDES — The New York Biomass Energy Alliance (NYBEA) is a coalition of individuals, businesses, and organizations that are working to “enhance support, understanding and
CNY Solar touts benefits of solar hot-water systems
CANASTOTA — A Canastota firm is specializing in systems that harness the power of the sun to generate heat as well as hot water. In
OCWA reduces energy consumption with National Grid Small-Business Services Program
SYRACUSE — Onondaga County Water Authority (OCWA) has reduced its energy usage and environmental impact by implementing energy-efficient interior and exterior lighting upgrades at 28 facilities throughout its four-county water-service area in Central New York. The lighting upgrades, completed by SmartWatt Energy, Inc. via the National Grid Small Business Services Program, have reduced OCWA’s energy
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — Onondaga County Water Authority (OCWA) has reduced its energy usage and environmental impact by implementing energy-efficient interior and exterior lighting upgrades at 28 facilities throughout its four-county water-service area in Central New York.
The lighting upgrades, completed by SmartWatt Energy, Inc. via the National Grid Small Business Services Program, have reduced OCWA’s energy consumption by 167,807 kWh, according to a news release from SmartWatt Energy, an energy-efficiency firm headquartered in the Albany area. That’s equivalent to removing an estimated 261,019 pounds of carbon dioxide from the environment per year, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calculations.
SmartWatt said it performed a complimentary energy analysis of all interior and exterior lighting and proposed a plan to replace the existing inefficient lighting systems with energy-efficient fluorescent and LED lighting fixtures at 28 of OCWA’s facilities. In addition to substantial energy and maintenance-cost savings, the lighting upgrades resulted in a National Grid rebate of $40,036 and are expected to pay for themselves in about 20 months, SmartWatt said, citing National Grid estimates.
SmartWatt said it is the administrator and implementation contractor for National Grid’s Small Business Services Program in Central and Northern New York. The Small Business Services Program helps businesses with an average peak demand of 100 kW or less per month conduct energy-efficient upgrade measures, according to the news release.
Through this program, SmartWatt said it will provide a free energy analysis, and National Grid will pay up to 70 percent of the installation costs completed by SmartWatt and finance the remaining amount interest-free for up to two years.
SmartWatt Energy said it provides “turnkey solutions for utilities, commercial, industrial, and institutional clients and also develops proprietary software that streamlines internal workflow processes and provides comprehensive program reporting.”
SmartWatt has three divisions: a commercial, industrial and institutional division; a utility unit; and a software-development division.
The Anatomy of a New York State Sales Tax Audit
Having been in the financial services business for more than 25 years, I have represented clients in numerous federal and state income-tax audits and state sales-tax audits. With the pressure at the federal and state level to raise revenues, we are finding increased audit activity at both the federal and state level. New York State
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Having been in the financial services business for more than 25 years, I have represented clients in numerous federal and state income-tax audits and state sales-tax audits. With the pressure at the federal and state level to raise revenues, we are finding increased audit activity at both the federal and state level. New York State corporate income-tax audits are the least common as the state benefits from any adjustments made at the federal level. Generally, taxpayers are required to report any federal changes to the state within a 90-day period, beginning with the date of the final federal determination. They merely piggyback off the IRS Audits.
However, New York State has found a goldmine in adding additional revenue to its coffers through sales-tax audits, as many business owners, while attempting to be compliant, do not understand the complex laws and regulations that govern the New York State sales and use tax.
As a transactional tax, every business must have a clear understanding of what it is selling and what it is buying, as the basic premise of the sales-and-use tax law is that every sale is a taxable sale unless it is exempt. Business owners must determine if they are required to collect and remit sales tax on the transactions in which they are the seller and must also determine if they are required to pay sales tax on the transaction in which they are the purchaser. That’s not as easy as it sounds.
The New York State sales-tax audit
What begins with a letter from New York State alerting you to the fact that you have been selected for audit can turn into a long and tedious journey filled with frustration, hard work, additional accounting fees, and interactions with auditors who take the position of “guilty until proven innocent.”
I have had the opportunity to work with some excellent New York State sales-tax auditors that have been properly trained, understand your industry from a sales-and-use tax perspective, and are willing to educate you in conjunction with their examination of your books and records. As the majority of taxpayers strive to be compliant, they appreciate the guidance and assistance provided when the auditor takes the time to work with them during the examination and provide guidance and training on sales and use taxes within their industry.
However, more often than not, the taxpayer is confronted by an auditor who has little-to-no training or working knowledge about your industry, refuses or is incapable of providing any assistance or education under the sales-and-use tax law, and whose apparent goal is to maximize the assessment against the taxpayer. As a result of this, the sales-tax audit experience develops into an adversarial relationship between the taxpayer and the state — something New York should not be doing, as the state attempts to reinvent and improve the business climate, retain businesses, and attract new businesses to the state.
How to prepare for the audit
There is not much you can do to avoid a sales-tax audit. New York State, on its website, states that some of the reasons a taxpayer can be chosen for audit include:
§ Failure to file a return
§ Failure to report income or sales
§ Excessive credits or exclusions claimed on a return
§ Incorrect or fraudulent refund claims or returns filed
§ Differences found when we compare a return to information we obtain from others such as the IRS, banks, employers, and other businesses
§ Results of prior audits. (However, a prior or a current audit isn’t necessarily cause to be selected for audit again.)
§ Misuse of exemption certificates
Realistically, there is no way to prepare for a sales-tax audit once it is under way. Preparation for a sales-tax audit begins years before you are chosen for the audit. There are so many industry-specific nuances that make it impossible to give you even a brief overview of the sales-and-use tax law as it would pertain to you. Whether you are in construction, manufacturing, retail, or any other business sector, you have to obtain an understanding of how the sales-and-use tax law applies to your industry and also understand the detailed recordkeeping requirements needed to support your payment, collection, and remittance of sales and use taxes.
New York State Tax Bulletin ST-770 (TB-ST-770), which can be found on the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance website (http://www.tax.ny.gov/), provides an overview of the recordkeeping requirements for sales-tax vendors. In the introduction it states:
“If you are registered for purposes of New York State’s sales tax, you are a trustee of New York State and you have a responsibility to collect the proper amount of sales tax from your customers and to remit the tax you have collected with your timely filed sales tax return.
“As a registered sales tax vendor, you are required to keep accurate records of all sales and purchases that you make. Keeping detailed records of your business operation will help you prepare accurate and complete sales tax returns. Detailed records will also serve as documentation of the accuracy of your returns if you are audited.”
Lucky you to have been given such responsibility and then to also have the honor to be scrutinized, chastised, and penalized in an audit where you have tried to do your best in following a set of complex laws and regulations that many of the sales-tax auditors don’t understand.
What should you do?
To avoid a most unpleasant experience, you should really do an assessment of how the sales-and-use tax law applies to your business and the potential exposure (time and money) that you may face in a sales-tax audit. If you have not had an audit and are unsure of your obligations and recordkeeping requirements, it may make sense to hire a third party to come in to provide you with a detailed overview of how the sales-and-use tax law applies in your business and assess your exposure. This will provide you with the opportunity to identify and correct, as required, any issues that are discovered. This can be a much more cost-effective method than waiting for the real thing to happen.
Even if you are currently not registered as sales-and-use tax vendor you should look to see if you are required to be. The audit period for a registered sales-tax vendor is generally three years, but the audit period for an unregistered vendor is six years. Those additional three years can amount to a significant amount of tax interest and penalty.
Karl Jacob is a tax partner with the accounting firm Dannible & McKee, LLP. Contact him at kjacob@dmcpas.com
Do Investors Deserve to Make Money?
Many people believe the rich inherit great fortunes and then sit idly by while their stocks make them more money. When you’re working long hours, this belief can provoke jealousy and inspire questions like, “Do investors even deserve to make money?” To respond, we must first define ownership, which is best thought of as a
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Many people believe the rich inherit great fortunes and then sit idly by while their stocks make them more money. When you’re working long hours, this belief can provoke jealousy and inspire questions like, “Do investors even deserve to make money?”
To respond, we must first define ownership, which is best thought of as a set of rights. When I own something, I decide what to do with it. I have dominion and authority.
Your autonomy is only limited by your duty to respect the autonomy of others. Just as you have a right to act however you see fit, so do others. If you infringe on the rights of another without permission, you are acting in the wrong.
In their paper “The Biological Basis of Human Rights,” Hugh Gibbons and Nicholas Skinner argue that the biological basis for legal wrong is “actions that, if undertaken, will diminish the will of another human.”
This self-ownership is then the basis of all our other rights including property rights. Ownership is “self-propagating,” meaning that the rights of ownership transmit from property to its products. Because you own yourself, you also own the fruits of your labor.
For example, when you make a stew, your efforts produced the food and you also own the product. The same goes for my chicken. I own the eggs the chicken produces just like I own the chicken. This is the right to property. With this ownership, I can trade my rights of ownership of goods for the rights to own something else.
Before currency, the product of my labor was the only way I could acquire the product of your labor. In a barter system, I trade my chicken, or the promise of my chicken, for your stew. If I don’t have any goods you want, I can’t acquire the rights to your stew.
However, in today’s monetary system of trade, instead of getting an inherently valuable good as a reward for my labor, I get money. This money is just a placeholder of my labor not yet rewarded.
When I work my 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. job and earn a paycheck, I receive a paper certificate I can trade in for the real reward of my labor. Instead of trying to guess what a farmer really wants for his chicken, I can give him a monetary certificate for him to use as he wishes.
So long as his payment remains in the form of currency, his labor in raising the chicken has still gone unrewarded. But when he uses that money to buy chicken feed or dinner for his family, he is finally reaping the reward of his labor.
Workers can delay the reward of their labor in many ways, sometimes indefinitely. One obvious method is loaning money to someone else who needs it because he either has not labored enough or not saved enough. When you loan someone your money, you are essentially loaning your labor.
Hard work was required to earn that money. Because you let this labor go unrewarded, you are now able to let the money, in some sense, work for you. By making the loan, you allow him to reap your labor’s reward first. In return for this privilege, he pays you back with interest.
Another way to prolong the reward is buying stores of value like real estate, precious metals, collectibles, and stocks. Each of these stores the value of your reward. Unlike an ice-cream cone where the value is either consumed immediately or lost, stores of value safeguard your ability to be rewarded for your labor at a later time.
If the value does more than remain constant but increases regularly, the store of value is an investment. Owning rental property and stocks, as well as owning a private business are all common investments you can make. Each one tends to increase in value over time.
Like loaning money, buying investments defers the reward of your labor while earning you more reward.
If I run my business well, the reward from my business will increase beyond its purchase price. If I run my business poorly, the certificates of labor I spent will forever go unrewarded.
In a business where the only employee is the owner, he obviously deserves all the profits. He is the one who invested money into it and the one laboring for it.
A restaurant is a more interesting example. Often, one owner has hired employees to host people, bus tables, and cook and serve the food. The owner may not work in the restaurant herself, but she will still receive all of the profits.
From those profits, the owner pays her employees, mortgage or rent, bills, and her own salary. She deserves a portion of the profit because she owns the eatery. Her unrewarded labor is at the heart of the value of the business. The present reward for the work done in the past is the restaurant. Just as you own yourself, you own the fruits of your labor. So too when you own a restaurant, you own the fruits of the eatery.
Imagine that this restaurant owner decides to sell her business. A man comes along and buys the place outright. A trade occurs when the previous owner’s unrewarded labor is freed from the restaurant while the new purchaser’s unrewarded labor is sunk into it. The new owner deserves the fruit of his property’s labor just as much as the previous owner did. Even though the previous owner was the one whose sweat equity built the business, she sold her right to ownership. With that right, she transferred the right to the fruits of the property.
Stock ownership works just like this example. Only instead of investors buying companies outright, they are buying the tiniest percentage of a publicly traded company. Their share of the ownership means they are due that share of the profits. Their unrewarded labor, their money, has bought them a store of value.
Investors defer consumption of their reward to get bigger and better compensation in the future. This system of property rights is not only responsible for civilization as we know it but also the most mundane aspects of financial planning.
For example, deferred consumption is the basis for all retirement planning. Taking care of our own retirement requires being able to store the value of our labor in property that not only safely stores the present value but can also beat inflation by continuing to produce more value. Nothing can replace this. To consume your reward later, a financial vehicle is needed to carry that value into the future.
That being said, sinking all of your retirement aspirations into one business might jeopardize those dreams. Small-business owners often make the mistake of pouring all their resources into the business they understand best, where they have the most control. But every business is at the mercy of macroeconomic changes, and small-business owners benefit from diversification.
Property rights give our society the basis for financial security. Some have even argued that property rights are more critical to civilization than democracy. Everyone can benefit from the ability to buy and sell what they own, even minority-business ownership.
David John Marotta is president of Marotta Wealth Management, Inc., which provides fee-only financial planning and wealth management. Contact him at david@emarotta.com. Megan Russell studied cognitive science at the University of Virginia and now specializes in explaining the complexities of economics and finance at www.marottaonmoney.com
Adirondack Barrel Cooperage wins EDGEccelerator Business Competition
UTICA — Adirondack Barrel Cooperage has been named winner of the EDGEccelerator Business Competition organized by Mohawk Valley EDGE. The start-up barrel-manufacturing company brings
Federal government runs a $148 billion deficit in August
The federal government ran a nearly $148 billion budget deficit in August, the U.S. Treasury Department reported Thursday. Spending totaled $333 billion while tax receipts
OCC, AmeriCU announce ‘multi-faceted’ partnership
ONONDAGA — Onondaga Community College (OCC) and AmeriCU Credit Union today announced a “multi-faceted” partnership that includes educational opportunities, scholarships, and an AmeriCU on-campus presence.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.