Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Cayuga Community Fund awards more than $35,000 in grants to area nonprofits
The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, has awarded $35,603 to 12 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County, according to a Nov. 18 news release. The following organizations received money: ABC Cayuga, Inc. received $5,000 in support of a capital campaign for its new Play Space, […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The Cayuga Community Fund, an affiliate fund of the Central New York Community Foundation, has awarded $35,603 to 12 nonprofit organizations that serve residents of Cayuga County, according to a Nov. 18 news release.
The following organizations received money:
These grants were made possible with support from the Cayuga Community Fund, the Evelyn B. & Emery S. Osborn Fund, and the Cayuga Health Association Fund, according to the news release.
The Cayuga Community Fund, created in 2008, is a geographically specific fund created to serve as a source of permanent charitable dollars available to nonprofits serving residents of Cayuga County. Grants are awarded from the endowment fund annually to aid “vital” programs in education, health, social services, the arts, civic and environmental concerns, as well as the preservation of historic resources in Cayuga County. The Cayuga Community Fund has granted more than $260,000 to nonprofit groups since 2010.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
25 Do’s and Don’ts of presenting in front of groups I have lost count of the number of company events, community awards, association dinners, and meetings that I have attended where the individual presenting has made classic errors in his/her delivery of material and keynote presentations. It is always so uncomfortable when I look around
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
25 Do’s and Don’ts of presenting in front of groups
I have lost count of the number of company events, community awards, association dinners, and meetings that I have attended where the individual presenting has made classic errors in his/her delivery of material and keynote presentations.
It is always so uncomfortable when I look around the room and see people twitching in their chairs, rolling their eyes, or focusing on their phones while someone is desperately attempting to speak in front of a crowd. The speaker may say it’s because the audience is rude, but the reality is that the speaker is unprepared. It is the speaker’s job to grab the audience’s attention and maintain it right up until the very last word.
When you are asked to speak in front of a group, be honored and review this list of do’s and don’ts to ensure you are successful and receive thunderous applause.
25 Do’s and Don’ts of presenting in front of groups:
1) Do not read to the audience from notes or a script. Make a few brief notes or outline, and master the main points.
2) Follow the 6 X 6 rule for PowerPoint presentations: Do not allow more than six words across and six lines down on one slide. Audiences do not come equipped with binoculars to read 1,000 words in an 11-point font on a slide deck.
3) Do not read your PowerPoint slides to the audience word-for-word.
4) Do use an appropriate number of slides. For example, do not use 60 slides for a 10-minute presentation.
5) Do not drink water, chew gum or candy, cough drops, or blow your nose while in front of the audience. Especially if you are wearing or using a microphone.
6) Use fitting facial expressions that align with your message. If you are talking about good news, act and look like it is good news.
7) Dress appropriately. Shirts and jackets are worn and tucked in correctly.
8) Do speak from the heart. Use real-life experiences and incidents to bridge information.
9) Know your audience. Deliver material that is congruent with the audience age, gender, etc.
10) Never, never, never start with or use jokes or movie clips that might in any way insult anyone in the audience. Err on the side of caution. If you offend even one person, you have offended too many.
11) Don’t overdo sounds, animation, or YouTube. Too much of a good thing is just that, too much.
12) Earn the right to give the presentation. This is the best way to ensure you will be successful.
13) Do be excited about the subject matter.
14) Be eager to share your information with the audience.
15) When possible, do not use a podium. Walk and engage with the audience.
16) Do have an effective opening and closing prepared. These segments are the most important part of any talk.
17) Use a question-and-answer session as an opportunity, not a death sentence.
18) Do prepare ahead of time for the three questions you hope you are not asked.
19) Do not stare at the person asking the question the entire time you are answering.
20) Do videotape yourself in front of a live audience and learn from that tape.
21) If you are as cool as a cucumber, you will probably be as interesting as one. Have fun with your talk and engage the audience.
22) Don’t count word whiskers while you are speaking (ahs and ums), it only makes them worse.
23) Movement is OK, but pacing, running, or standing in one place all the time are not.
24) Your presentation should fit the allotted time. No one likes a speaker who goes over time.
25) If you speak from the heart and rely on your knowledge and experiences, your talk will flow and you will be well-received by your audience.
Leslie English is an executive coach and president of Dale Carnegie Training of CNY, which offers professional training services including executive coaching, strategic planning, leadership development, and sales and presentation training. Contact English at (315) 457-1300 or visit: http://centralny.dalecarnegie.com
CIBA celebrates global entrepreneurship
Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose — Jean–Baptiste Alphonse Karr BINGHAMTON — The epigram attributed to French writer Karr translates as: “The more it changes, the more it remains the same thing.” How apropos of America’s historical attitude toward global trade, which periodically swings like a pendulum between encouraging and discouraging multilateral agreements. Encouraging
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose — Jean–Baptiste Alphonse Karr
BINGHAMTON — The epigram attributed to French writer Karr translates as: “The more it changes, the more it remains the same thing.” How apropos of America’s historical attitude toward global trade, which periodically swings like a pendulum between encouraging and discouraging multilateral agreements.
Encouraging global trade is the focus of the Center for International Business Advancement (CIBA) at Binghamton University, which sponsored its second annual Global Trade and Investment Forum of the Southern Tier on Nov. 14. CIBA is an applied-research and educational center as well as a policy forum dedicated to the internationalization of local business and academic communities in the Southern Tier. Spearheaded by the founding director, Dr. Elena Iankova, the Nov. 14 forum — focused on small business — was particularly timely in light of the recent presidential campaign, where both major-party candidates felt comfortable bashing global-trade agreements.
The entrepreneur’s perspective
The first speaker was Alex Deyhim, president of Advanced Design Consulting (ADC). Born in Iran, Dreyhim immigrated to the U.S. and earned two graduate degrees from Cornell University, one in mechanical engineering and the second in business administration. In 1995, he launched ADC (www.adc9001.com) as a custom-design, manufacturing-system prime contractor. From its modest beginnings in a small office at the Cornell Business & Technology Park, ADC now operates from a 22,000-square-foot building in Lansing, near Ithaca; employs 24 people, many of whom are engineers; and holds 14 patents with another dozen pending.
“Within the first four months [of opening our doors], I realized there wasn’t enough business in the region to support my business,” recalls Deyhim. “To survive, I had to expand my … [geographic horizons] and to think globally. Today, ADC has customers in 26 countries, and we compete successfully against billion-dollar companies … How did we do it? First, we were early adopters of the Internet, an amazing invention that provides global knowledge and lets us reach our customers directly. (ADC only uses sales brokers in two countries.) Second, we have taken advantage of government support to help us sell globally and manage the risks involved in foreign sales. Next, our global reach provides numerous suppliers who provide added bargaining power to decrease our costs. Selling globally also provides diversification and the stability that smooths out business cycles.”
U.S. trade policy
Deyhim was followed by Mitchell Ferguson, acting director of the bureau of economic and business affairs, office of bilateral trade affairs, U.S. State Department. Ferguson began his remarks discussing the current headwinds against global trade and then provided an historical perspective on America’s attitude against global trade. “The U.S. imposed its first trade embargo back in 1807 during the Jefferson administration,” said Ferguson. “The Congress enacted a general embargo against France and Great Britain for ignoring American neutrality during the Napoleonic Wars. The Britian’s Royal Navy was impressing American seamen and their cargoes as contraband. The U.S. chose to respond with commercial warfare rather than mobilization. The embargo … [flopped] both diplomatically and commercially and was revoked after 15 months.”
Congress passed the first protective tariff in 1816 and raised the rates in 1824. “In 1828, John Quincy Adams signed legislation dubbed the ‘Tariff of Abominations’ by its southern detractors,” continued Ferguson. “The 1828 tariff protected Northern industries and agriculture in the Western states, which were suffering from low-priced, imported goods. The punitive tax ended up forcing all U.S. citizens to pay higher prices for goods not produced here. The South ended up paying higher prices for goods produced in the North and the reduction of British goods exported also limited Britain’s ability to pay for the South’s main revenue stream — cotton exports. The tariff led to a constitutional crisis finally resolved in 1833.”
With the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, Congress again turned to protective tariffs to stave off a collapse of the economy by passing the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act, which raised tariffs on more than 20,000 imported goods. Foreign retaliation was swift in coming. The effort to protect American jobs and farmers from foreign competition failed: In 1930, unemployment stood at 8 percent; in 1933 it was 25 percent.
“In 1944, at the height of World war II, 44 Allied nations assembled at Bretton Woods in New Hampshire and hammered out rules governing commercial and financial relations among the U.S., Canada, and Western Europe,” noted Ferguson. [This was the first example of independent nations joining together to govern monetary relations. The accord established the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Redevelopment.]
“In October 1947, 23 nations assembled in Geneva and signed the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT),” stated Ferguson. “GATT substantially reduced tariffs and other trade barriers and eliminated preferences. [The agreement was extended to 123 nations in 1994 in the Uruguay Round Agreements, which established the World Trade Organization.] The alphabet soup of trade agreements continued with NAFTA, CAFTA, KORDS, etc., generally with strong, bipartisan support.
“The pendulum has now swung back toward protectionism, putting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement in jeopardy. Campaign rhetoric aside, the deal may now be a heavy lift but it’s not dead, because TPP is as much strategic as economic. Ash Carter [the U.S. Sec. of Defense] made the best case last April when he said ‘… passing TPP is as important … as another aircraft carrier … It would deepen our alliances partnerships abroad and underscore our lasting commitment to the Asia-Pacific.’” Rep. Kevin Brady, a Republican and the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, echoed Ferguson’s opinion recently when he told a panel of the Wall Street Journal CEO Council that TPP was defensible. He urged Congress “… to renegotiate, fix any problems that exist, and move forward.”
Ferguson concluded his remarks by noting that U.S. trade policy is a “long game’ in which soft power plays a leading role. “It’s pretty simple,” he averred. “You can’t have global trade without rules that everyone agrees to and follows.”
Federal government support
The next speaker was Dan Rickman, district international trade officer for the Syracuse district office of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). The Syracuse office covers 34 counties in Central New York, ranging from the Southern Tier to the Canadian border and east to the Massachusetts and Vermont state lines.
“The SBA is the federal government’s lead agency supporting small business, which we generally define as companies with fewer than 500 employees or less than $7.5 million in annual revenue, depending on the industry,” Rickman stressed. “Our office offers financing, guarantees, counseling, training, and even opportunities for government contracting. Small business is really big business when it comes to exporting: it represents 30 percent of all U.S. export dollars. In New York state, small business provides 55 percent of all export sales. In 2010, that amounted to $34 billion. Nationwide, 70 percent of all exporters have fewer than 20 employees, and 97 percent of all companies that export are … [categorized] as small businesses.”
Rickman emphasized that the SBA was not a direct lender. “Our office provides guarantees up to 90 percent of the loan amount to area companies that want to borrow money from a bank,” he intones. “Our limit is $5 million. The purpose of the loan must support exporting to qualify for the maximum guarantee of 90 percent … It’s important to remember that the borrower does not have to export directly to qualify for a guaranteed loan. If a company manufactures something for a customer, and the manufacturer’s product or assembly is used in another product that is exported by the customer, the borrower qualifies under SBA rules as an exporter.”
Rickman also explained that other federal-government services are available to help exporters, for example in the area of mitigating risk. Getting paid is a concern of every exporter. The U.S. Export-Import Bank offers trade-credit insurance, which can also allow the exporter to extend credit terms to foreign buyers. In addition, the SBA works closely with the U.S. Department of Commerce, which offers marketing tools for small businesses to identify new markets for their products.
New York State government support
The forum next turned to Jinshui Zhang, director of international business development at the New York State Small Business Development Center Central Administration. Zhang has held the position since 1997. He ran through a litany of services offered by the Empire State: export information; market evaluation; matchmaking of distributors, suppliers, manufacturers, partners, and agents; identifying the export process, sourcing, joint-ventures, and investment opportunities; explaining government regulations and taxes; training; leading missions to foreign countries; and hosting foreign delegations. Zhang spent a large portion of his presentation on one effort as an example of what his office does.
“In 2012, New York led a five-day mission of state winery executives to Shanghai, which is a free-trade zone, to see the New York State Wine Outlet,” he asserted.
“The outlet serves as a gateway for state wine products to be introduced into the Chinese market, a launching pad to showcase and promote state wine products for year-round display and sale. This effort is a collaborative led by the state’s Small Business Development Corp. in coordination with the state’s Department of Agriculture and Markets and the state’s Department of Economic Development. [In effect,] … the outlet has combined the functions of exhibition, promotion, trade, and sales. It’s a low-cost way for New York wineries to enter the Chinese marketplace with little risk and without the need to set up an independent distribution network. Thirty-two wineries participated in the mission and … [garnered] 12 orders totaling 313,000 bottles of New York State wine. Our success led us to open another wine center in Tangshan, located in North China. New York State is currently negotiating for three more centers in North China … Products manufactured in New York have a special … [cachet] with the Chinese.”
The entrepreneur’s perspective redux
Patrick Doyle, sales and marketing director for the Pleasant Valley Wine Co., was the final speaker at the forum. Located in Hammondsport, Pleasant Valley, founded in the same year President Lincoln was first elected to office, is known for a variety of its brands, including Great Western, Gold Seal, and Widmer. In addition to producing wines, the company crushes grapes and stores wine at its 420,000-square-foot facility for other grape/wine companies.
“We shipped a pallet of our wines to Shanghai six weeks before the mission started,” Doyle intoned. “The wines arrived in time to be displayed, and the Chinese were delighted with our products. The Shanghai outlet made it easy for us to enter the Chinese market and expose our brands. I would say the mission was a success. Today, we continue to sell into the Chinese market through a broker located in Rochester, although in the short term, most of our attention is focused on penetrating more U.S. states to expand our distribution.” Doyle also informed the audience that more missions were scheduled in 2017 and support for exporting was also available from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Trade Office.
The forum concluded with a question-and-answer segment followed by lunch and networking. Those in attendance seemed to take the long view that, despite the current swing toward protectionism, the trajectory of global trade is toward expansion and not contraction. The history of U.S. trade agreements over the past 72 years supports a long-term trend toward the globalization of trade. Iankova says that CIBA is committed to encouraging this trend in the Southern Tier. The center’s challenge is to convince more small businesses that there is plenty of opportunity for growth in expanding into international markets and help available to overcome the obstacles to exporting. CIBA’s role is to educate and encourage the region’s business community. CIBA’s director calls the Southern Tier a “sleeping beauty with a lot of potential for growth through internationalization … To unlock this potential, CIBA relies on a [wide] network of strategic partners [in business, government, and academia].”
According to the story of “Sleeping Beauty,” it only took one kiss from the prince to awaken the heroine. Iankova has no illusions that awakening the Southern Tier business community for expansion into global markets requires a little more effort.
Contact Poltenson at npoltenson@cnybj.com

WRVO Public Media adds new signals in Rome, western Madison County
OSWEGO, N.Y. — WRVO Public Media has expanded its broadcast network with the addition of two new signals serving the city of Rome and western

Onondaga County Medical Society installs new president, officers
SALINA, N.Y. — The Onondaga County Medical Society (OCMS) has installed Dr. Mary Abdulky as its 189th president. The installation was part of the Medical

Cuomo, Cayuga Milk Ingredients oppose proposed Canadian regs on dairy product
The farmer owners of Cayuga Milk ingredients, Inc. in Aurelius invested more than $104 million in a “state-of-the-art” milk-processing facility to market their dairy ingredients, including the production of ultra-filtered milk, worldwide. That’s according to Kevin Ellis, CEO of Cayuga Milk Ingredients. Ellis is concerned that Canada is contemplating a national ingredients strategy that specifically
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The farmer owners of Cayuga Milk ingredients, Inc. in Aurelius invested more than $104 million in a “state-of-the-art” milk-processing facility to market their dairy ingredients, including the production of ultra-filtered milk, worldwide.
That’s according to Kevin Ellis, CEO of Cayuga Milk Ingredients.
Ellis is concerned that Canada is contemplating a national ingredients strategy that specifically targets the importation of ultra-filtered milk.
Ultra-filtered milk is a protein-rich type of skim milk and is primarily used in the production of cheese and yogurt.
“This action taken by Canada seems to be incongruent with NAFTA and WTO rules. Cayuga stands to lose 25 percent of its sales through this action. This will have a devastating effect on Cayuga, and we are urging our U.S. trade representatives to investigate whether or not the Canadian National Ingredients Strategy is compliant with NAFTA and WTO rules,” said Ellis. NAFTA is short for the North American Free Trade Agreement and WTO is the abbreviation for the Geneva, Switzerland–based World Trade Organization.
Cuomo opposition
Ellis was quoted in an Oct. 31 news release from the office of Gov. Andrew Cuomo in which he announced his opposition to proposed regulations that would create a barrier for New York’s dairy farmers exporting ultra-filtered milk to Canada.
In a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Cuomo called on the Canadian government to develop a national agreement that will “mutually benefit” trade across borders.
If proposed provincial standards are implemented across Canada, they could result in a $50 million market loss for New York’s dairy industry, Cuomo’s office contends.
Cuomo’s letter was issued in response to the Province of Ontario and the Canadian Milk Supply Management Committee’s regulatory plans.
They include the Ontario Class 6 regulation and the proposed establishment of a new national-ingredient strategy that could “effectively restrict” New York exports of ultra-filtered milk.
The letter calls on the Canadian government to confirm that Ontario’s Class 6 regulations and the Canadian National Ingredients Strategy are both consistent with existing WTO policies and NAFTA.
Cuomo’s letter coincided with the 25th Tri-National Agricultural Accord, held in late October in Niagara Falls, Ontario.
The Tri-National Agricultural Accord provides a forum for the U.S., Canada, and Mexico to work together toward “shared priorities” and discuss important topics, including climate change, trade, and the expansion of food-processing sectors.
“New York’s dairy sector is an essential part of our agricultural industry, and these regulations could have devastating effects on our dairy farmers and their families,” Cuomo said in the release. “I urge our Canadian neighbors to reconsider these potentially harmful regulations and to continue our courteous, mutually beneficial trade relations.”
Seeking agreement
Over the course of the last several months, New York says it has made “several attempts to find a solution agreeable” to both parties.
New York Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul raised the state’s concerns with Canadian officials during a recent visit to Canada.
New York Agriculture Commissioner Richard Ball in August sent a letter to his counterpart in the Province of Ontario, outlining the “critical nature” of the proposal and its effects on New York State.
Commissioner Ball attended the Tri-National Agricultural Accord to raise New York’s concerns in person.
“New York’s dairy farmers rely heavily on the export of their products and we need to do what we can to ensure they continue to have a home for their milk. We are hopeful the Canadian government, as it weighs its options, will take into account its long and successful trade partnership with New York, and act to resolve this issue that would be detrimental to our agricultural industry,” Ball said in Cuomo’s news release.
New York exports more to Canada than to any other country in the world, Cuomo’s office said.
The bilateral trade relationship in 2015 totaled $32.93 billion in goods and supported more than 500,000 jobs regionally.
New York’s dairy industry is the state’s largest agricultural sector. With more than 5,000 farms, the dairy industry “supports the framework” of the agricultural economy.
The dairy industry brought in $2.5 billion in sales, and hired almost 20,000 people in New York in 2015.
New York’s dairy products account for at least 50 percent of all New York State agricultural commodities exported internationally.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
New state law to aid the expansion of homebrewing
New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo recently signed into law legislation to help expand “homebrew” beer, wine, and cider-making in New York. The bill (S.1227B/A1100B) allows for the creation and operation of custom beer, wine, and cider-production centers that will rent space and equipment to people looking to produce beer, wine, or cider for home
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo recently signed into law legislation to help expand “homebrew” beer, wine, and cider-making in New York.
The bill (S.1227B/A1100B) allows for the creation and operation of custom beer, wine, and cider-production centers that will rent space and equipment to people looking to produce beer, wine, or cider for home consumption.
“The craft beverage industry has taken this state by storm, and more and more New Yorkers want to try their hand at making the next great Empire State beer, wine, or cider,” Cuomo said in a news release. “This new law builds upon this increased interest, supports local agriculture, and breaks down artificial barriers to allow innovation and creativity to flow.”
New York’s craft beverage industry is one of the fastest growing in the nation, Cuomo’s office said, but many urban and suburban residents often cannot afford or do not have access to the space or equipment to make homemade beer, cider, or wine in their homes or apartments. These custom production centers enabled by the law will provide space and lower the overhead costs of production, while also providing amateur brewers and wine and cider makers with the local ingredients and expert training needed when first starting out, the release noted.
The new custom beer, wine, and cider-production centers will be regulated by the State Liquor Authority.
New York is now home to more than 500 farm wineries, breweries, distilleries, and cideries the release stated. The number of farm wineries in New York has increased by more than 60 percent, from 195 in 2010 to 315 now, while the number of farm distilleries grew from just 10 in 2010 to 95 today. The state has created two new licenses since 2011: the farm-brewery license in 2013 and the farm-cidery license in 2014, with New York now home to 129 farm breweries and 22 farm cideries businesses.
Contact The Business Journal News Network at news@cnybj.com
ConMed reports Q3 profit dip, maintains earnings guidance
UTICA — ConMed Corporation (NASDAQ: CNMD) recently reported net earnings of $7.3 million, or 26 cents a share, in the third quarter, down from $8.9 million, or 32 cents, in the year-ago period. The earnings figure includes business acquisition and restructuring costs, along with a gain on the sale of the company’s facility in Centennial,
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
UTICA — ConMed Corporation (NASDAQ: CNMD) recently reported net earnings of $7.3 million, or 26 cents a share, in the third quarter, down from $8.9 million, or 32 cents, in the year-ago period.
The earnings figure includes business acquisition and restructuring costs, along with a gain on the sale of the company’s facility in Centennial, Colorado, while the earnings figure during the same period in 2015 included restructuring costs, according to a ConMed news release.
ConMed’s domestic sales, which represented 53.7 percent of total revenue, increased 13 percent as “strong” growth in its general-surgery business was partially offset by declines in orthopedics and visualization, the company said.
The SurgiQuest acquisition contributed to 32.1 percent year-over-year growth in the U.S. general-surgery business.
ConMed closed on its acquisition of SurgiQuest, Inc., a Connecticut–based surgical-device maker, in early January 2016.
International sales, which represented 46.3 percent of total revenue, increased 5.1 percent in the third quarter compared to the third quarter of 2015 on a reported basis.
Foreign currency-exchange rates, including the effects of the FX hedging program, had a negative impact of $3.4 million on third-quarter sales.
In constant currency, international sales increased 9.2 percent versus the prior-year period.
“We are encouraged by the continued progress in our international markets, strong contribution from AirSeal, and solid organic growth within general surgery. While the rebuilding of our domestic orthopedics franchise is taking longer than expected, we feel confident that we are making the appropriate changes to return this business to growth. Overall, we are pleased with a return to positive organic growth on a constant currency basis,” Curt Hartman, president and CEO of ConMed, said in its release. “As we close out the year, we look to build upon the recent momentum across several of our businesses while continuing to focus on improving operating efficiencies and reaccelerating organic growth across all of our product categories.”
2016 outlook
ConMed didn’t make any changes to its previously issued financial guidance.
The firm continues to expect 2016 constant-currency, organic-sales growth in the range of -1 percent to 1 percent and sales related to the SurgiQuest acquisition between $62 million and $67 million.
Based on foreign currency-exchange rates as of Oct. 21, ConMed said it continues to anticipate the negative impact of foreign exchange for the year in the range of $17 million to $19 million.
ConMed continues to expect 2016 reported sales of $757 million to $767 million, which represents growth of 5.3 percent to 6.7 percent over reported 2015 revenue of $719 million.
The company expects adjusted net earnings per share between $1.83 and $1.93.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com

Community Bank to sponsor Empire State Winter Games
CANTON — Community Bank, N.A. on Oct. 26 announced that it would serve as the title sponsor for the 2017 Empire State Winter Games. Mark Tryniski, president and CEO of Community Bank, made the announcement during a press conference held at the bank’s branch in Canton in St. Lawrence County. “We feel it’s our obligation
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
CANTON — Community Bank, N.A. on Oct. 26 announced that it would serve as the title sponsor for the 2017 Empire State Winter Games.
Mark Tryniski, president and CEO of Community Bank, made the announcement during a press conference held at the bank’s branch in Canton in St. Lawrence County.
“We feel it’s our obligation to support the well-being of the communities we serve and we have a strong presence and growing presence across the entirety of the North Country … we thought it was entirely befitting to support the Empire State Games and the tourism and the visibility,” says Tryniski. He spoke with CNYBJ on Nov. 16.
Community Bank System, parent company of Community Bank, N.A., was founded in Canton in St. Lawrence County 150 years ago, he noted. The banking company is currently headquartered in DeWitt.
When asked how much funding Community Bank is providing for the Winter Games, Tryniski says, “I will tell you it’s a six-figure number and we’re happy to do it.”
The partnership will support the “community-driven,” multi-day sporting event, which is expected to have a nearly $3 million economic impact on the region, according to a news release announcing Community Bank as the Games’ title sponsor.
The 37th edition of the Empire State Winter Games (ESWG) are set for Feb. 2-5, 2017, at various venues in the North Country and Adirondack regions.
The Winter Games will bring together more than 1,900 athletes from across New York state and beyond to compete in 19 winter sports, including marathon skating and mogul skiing, which were added for the upcoming edition.
“Coming on the heels of a successful re-launch of the ESWGs in 2016, this partnership with [Community Bank N.A.], as well as an overwhelming level of support from the entire North Country community, ensures that 2017 will be the most exciting and successful year ever,” Tait Wardlaw, executive director of the ESWG, boasted in the Community Bank news release. “The games are truly a reflection of the enthusiasm and true sense of cooperation that everyone has for our regional winter sports.”

The Empire State Winter Games is the result of a partnership between the Regional Office of Sustainable Tourism (ROOST), the towns of North Elba, Wilmington, Tupper Lake, Harrietstown, Malone, and Brighton; the villages of Lake Placid, Tupper Lake, Paul Smiths, Malone, Wilmington, and Saranac Lake; the counties of Essex and Franklin; the New York State Olympic Regional Development Authority, and New York State Senator Betty Little (R–Glens Falls), according to the event’s website.
Support for the Empire State Winter Games is provided by a Market NY grant through the “I Love NY” program and the New York State Division of Tourism as a part of the regional economic-development council awards, the website says. The nonprofit LPECQD, Inc., a subsidiary of ROOST, is “fiscally responsible for the Empire State Winter Games.”
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
A Suggested Post-Election Lesson Plan for Teachers
We have many teachers telling kids the country’s gone to Hades. Because voters chose Donald Trump. We have professors and college administrators coddling upset students, with safe zones, grief counselors, and sympathy. Please pardon me for my stupidity. But it seems to me that this election is a gold mine for good teachers. By good
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
We have many teachers telling kids the country’s gone to Hades. Because voters chose Donald Trump.
We have professors and college administrators coddling upset students, with safe zones, grief counselors, and sympathy.
Please pardon me for my stupidity. But it seems to me that this election is a gold mine for good teachers. By good teachers I mean those who leave their political biases at home. And those who use today’s events to urge students to think.
Here are some good questions for a lesson plan: What just happened in our election? Why did something similar happen with voters in the UK?
Why does something similar brew in various countries of the EU? In France and the Netherlands in particular.
Why has the Democrat Party in the U.S. lost so many governorships in the last eight years? As well as control of state legislatures? As well as both houses of Congress? They hold as few elected offices as they have for almost 100 years. What is going on with them? Or with the voters they no longer have? This is a huge development.
How did Trump get to be President-elect? How did he vanquish two massive political machines named Clinton and Bush? How did he hog-tie 16 Republican opponents? He did this despite the war big media waged against him. In fact, he spat in their faces. He did this despite the education profession. Teacher unions spent millions to defeat Trump. Academia roared its disapproval of him.
Most Hollywood and TV stars openly despised Trump. Many prominent Republicans worked openly against him. Many others did so quietly. Conservative magazines and websites viciously undercut him.
Ohio’s popular Republican governor spurned him. He refused to help Trump through his network of political workers. Yet Trump still won the Buckeye State handily.
Meanwhile, he spent a fraction of the money those who opposed him spent.
So how did Trump pull this off? This guy who had never held an office? He had never run a campaign.
Students, let’s define extraordinary. Now, whether he is your hero or your Hitler, can you see how this man is extraordinary? He achieved what most politicians and political “experts” claimed was utterly impossible.
So how did he do this? How did he out-think these people? What did he see they did not? And why do you suppose he saw it and they missed it? Did his opponents have biases that blinded them, to the realities that Trump saw?
Does Trump represent a major movement in American attitudes? Will this election re-align the political parties?
To guide them a teacher might chalk a straight line across the blackboard or draw one across a whiteboard. The line represents the spectrum of political positions in America.
On the center-left we place Democrats. On the far left, Bernie Sanders and his Socialists. Beyond them, Communists. On the center-right, the Republicans. Further right, the Conservatives. The further left or right we go, the more the people cling to ideologies. Closer to the center, we find less ideology.
Is it possible, students, that Donald Trump plopped his campaign square in the middle of this line? In doing so, did he suck the oxygen from the right? Did he lure many from the left who did not share the ideology Democrats promoted? Did he win with Democrats near the middle who don’t lay awake worrying about trans-gendered bathrooms? Or political correctness. Or safe rooms. Or extreme green beliefs.
And why did Democrat voters move toward Trump? Why did they back off from Hillary Clinton? Why did Republicans flip the bird to many of their leaders to vote for Trump?
Pose questions like this to American students. Identify propaganda in their responses. Force them to think about this election. Get them beyond the blurbs from party spinmeisters.
This may turn out to be one of the most significant elections in our history. We should alert our young people to this possibility.
From Tom…as in Morgan.
Tom Morgan writes about political, financial, and other subjects from his home near Oneonta. Several upstate radio stations carry his daily commentary, Tom Morgan’s Money Talk. Contact him at tomasinmorgan.com
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.