Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.

DEC announces land acquisition to preserve more than 3,300 acres in Herkimer County
SALISBURY, N.Y. — The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on Oct. 22 announced the acquisition of 3,387 acres of forest and wetlands located in the towns of Salisbury and Norway in Herkimer County. The parcel, purchased from the Open Space Institute (OSI), will be managed for forest products, expanded recreational access, protection […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SALISBURY, N.Y. — The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on Oct. 22 announced the acquisition of 3,387 acres of forest and wetlands located in the towns of Salisbury and Norway in Herkimer County.
The parcel, purchased from the Open Space Institute (OSI), will be managed for forest products, expanded recreational access, protection of critical drinking water sources, and enhancement of ecosystem resilience, per the announcement.
The property includes hardwood and softwood forests, nearly 900 acres of wetlands, and several miles of Spruce Creek, a tributary of the East Canada Creek which eventually flows into the Mohawk River. The property sits just outside the southwestern boundary of the Adirondack Forest Preserve and connects to more than 150,000 acres of DEC’s Ferris Lake Wild Forest, the DEC said.
The wetlands and forests on the parcel provide habitat for a wide range of species including black bear, white-tailed deer, bobcat, river otter, and fisher. These features also play a vital role in filtering rainwater that serves as part of the drinking water supply for the city of Little Falls, the department stated.
Ten acres of the property will be added to the Adirondack Forest Preserve, while the remaining acreage located just outside of the Adirondack Park boundary will be state forest.
Although the purchase and transfer of the Spruce Creek property are now complete, public access is currently limited to one location off Dairy Hill Road just south of the junction with Guideboard Road. DEC staff are working to establish additional safe and sustainable access points that will support future recreational use while protecting natural resources. The public is asked to respect the limited access during development of these additional points. The DEC said it will provide updates and announce when these improvements are completed.
The acquisition was made possible by OSI’s $3 million land purchase from Datum 9 Forestry LLC. DEC subsequently acquired the 3,387-acre parcel using $3 million from the state’s Environmental Protection Fund (EPF). The EPF supports climate-change mitigation and adaptation efforts, improves agricultural resources to promote sustainable agriculture, protects water sources, advances conservation efforts, and provides recreational opportunities for New Yorkers, the DEC said. The EPF also supports New York’s 30×30 initiative, which commits to conserving 30 percent of lands and waters by 2030.
Oneida County hotel business benchmarks improve in October
UTICA, N.Y. — Oneida County hotels posted an increase in a trio of three key indicators of business performance in October. The hotel-occupancy rate (rooms
Onondaga County hotels see nearly 5 percent increase in occupancy
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Onondaga County hotels hosted more guests in October, as two other key indicators of business performance also rose during the month. The

Utica First Insurance Company readies for leadership transition
UTICA, N.Y. — Utica First Insurance Company will have a new president and CEO when the calendar turns to 2026. Ryan Fleming will succeed retiring president and CEO Scott Shatraw. The firm announced Fleming’s appointment on Sept. 16. Fleming joined Utica First Insurance in 2024 as VP of marketing and agencies and has “demonstrated his
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
UTICA, N.Y. — Utica First Insurance Company will have a new president and CEO when the calendar turns to 2026.
Ryan Fleming will succeed retiring president and CEO Scott Shatraw. The firm announced Fleming’s appointment on Sept. 16.
Fleming joined Utica First Insurance in 2024 as VP of marketing and agencies and has “demonstrated his ability to lead the company into the future, advancing its vision and promoting its core values.” Prior to joining Utica First, he worked at The Travelers Indemnity Company.
His responsibilities have included working with the marketing team to increase brand awareness, building strong relationships with key industry partners, retail agents, and wholesalers, and enhancing the agent/broker experience.
He has more than 25 years of insurance industry leadership experience, with a niche in sales and marketing.
“Utica First has an incredibly strong 122-year tradition of putting our agents, brokers, and customers first,” Fleming said in the announcement. “I’m honored and enthusiastic about continuing to build on that legacy with an emphasis on personal service, innovation, and collaboration.”
Fleming earned a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Marquette University.
Shatraw was appointed Utica First’s president and CEO in 2018. He joined the company in 1990 as controller and subsequently held positions of increasing responsibility, including senior vice president and CFO.
“Ryan’s business acumen, industry knowledge, and agent/broker and customer focus have already made a tremendous impact on Utica First,” Shatraw said in the announcement. “He’s ideally suited to continue to grow the company as President and CEO while providing the best possible service and products to all of our partners and customers.”
Under Shatraw’s leadership over the past seven years, Utica First has “successfully anticipated customer needs while achieving profitable growth,” the company said.
Utica First Insurance Company has more than 100 employees, 100,000 written policies, and agents in nine states.

Community Financial System appoints Vaccaro as new independent director
DeWITT, N.Y. — Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE: CBU) announced it has appointed John A. Vaccaro to its board of directors as a new independent director, effective Oct. 1. Vaccaro is chairman emeritus of MML Investors Services, LLC, a national broker-dealer and registered investment advisor with more than $285 billion in assets under management, and
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
DeWITT, N.Y. — Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE: CBU) announced it has appointed John A. Vaccaro to its board of directors as a new independent director, effective Oct. 1.
Vaccaro is chairman emeritus of MML Investors Services, LLC, a national broker-dealer and registered investment advisor with more than $285 billion in assets under management, and chairman of MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB, both subsidiaries of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. Vaccaro led MassMutual Financial Advisors and served as CEO of MML Investors Services from 2009 until March 2025, when he stepped down as CEO in connection with his upcoming retirement in 2026. In that post, he led a team of more than 7,500 financial advisors and 3,000 support staff across more than 1,600 locations nationwide, according to the Community Financial System announcement.
With Vaccaro’s appointment, the Community Financial System board now consists of 13 directors, 12 of whom are independent. He also joined the board of directors of Community Bank, N.A., the company’s banking subsidiary, and will serve on its trust committee.
“John brings to the Board a proven track record of scaling a complex, large financial services business with substantial market position. His experience, track record, reputation and network in the wealth management space will be very additive as we continue to grow our Company along our diversified financial services strategy,” Dimitar A. Karaivanov, president and CEO of Community Financial System, said in the announcement.
Community Financial System, Inc. is a DeWitt–based financial services company that is focused on four main business lines — banking services, employee-benefit services, insurance services, and wealth-management services. Community Bank, N.A., is among the nation’s 100 largest banking institutions with more than $16 billion in assets and operates about 200 branches across upstate New York, northeastern Pennsylvania, Vermont, and western Massachusetts.

SRC appoints director of autonomous collaborative systems
CICERO, N.Y. — SRC, Inc. has promoted Michael Addario to director of autonomous collaborative systems (ACS). In this role, Addario will oversee the ACS business unit’s strategic vision, program execution, financial performance, business development, customer satisfaction and engineering excellence, the Cicero–based company said in a Nov. 10 announcement. Addario joined SRC in 2003 as a
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
CICERO, N.Y. — SRC, Inc. has promoted Michael Addario to director of autonomous collaborative systems (ACS).
In this role, Addario will oversee the ACS business unit’s strategic vision, program execution, financial performance, business development, customer satisfaction and engineering excellence, the Cicero–based company said in a Nov. 10 announcement.
Addario joined SRC in 2003 as a digital design engineer. Since then, he has taken on roles of increasing responsibility in digital engineering, most recently serving as senior program manager for ACS. He holds a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering from Clarkson University.
“With his extensive experience and proven record of entrepreneurial leadership, Michael is well prepared to excel in this new role,” Kevin Hair, president and CEO of SRC, said. “His results-driven approach fosters efficiency and innovation, and I am confident he will positively contribute to our mission of helping keep America and our allies safe and strong.”
SRC is a not-for-profit research and development company that says it combines information, science, technology, and ingenuity to solve problems in the areas of defense, environment, and intelligence. It employs more than 1,400 people. In addition to its Cicero headquarters, SRC has locations across the U.S., as well as sites in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
VIEWPOINT: Gender-Based Violence & the Workplace Policy Mandate Goes into Effect
It’s for bidders on NYS contracts As part of this year’s budget, New York State added Section 139-m to the State Finance Law, which requires bidders on competitive state procurements to certify that they have a written policy addressing gender-based violence and the workplace and that such policy meets certain requirements. The law went into effect
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
As part of this year’s budget, New York State added Section 139-m to the State Finance Law, which requires bidders on competitive state procurements to certify that they have a written policy addressing gender-based violence and the workplace and that such policy meets certain requirements. The law went into effect on Nov. 5, 2025.
The statute requires competitive bids to contain the following statement:
“By submission of this bid, each bidder and each person signing on behalf of any bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, under penalty of perjury, that the bidder has and has implemented a written policy addressing gender-based violence and the workplace and has provided such policy to all of its employees, directors and board members. Such policy shall, at a minimum, meet the requirements of subdivision 11 of section five hundred seventy-five of the executive law.”
Applicable New York State procurement guidelines define a “bidder” as “any individual, business, vendor or other legal entity, or any employee, agent, consultant or person acting on behalf thereof, that submits a bid in response to a solicitation.”
While this certification is mandatory for all bids that are legally required to be competitive, it may also be required for bids on noncompetitive contracts at the discretion of the public entity awarding the contract. Accordingly, employers who contract with New York State agencies should review new or renewed contracts for any new requirements or obligations, including the new requirements under State Finance Law Section 139-m.
A bid that fails to comply with the new requirements will not be considered or be awarded the contract. The law also states that if a bidder cannot make the required certification of compliance with the new requirements, the bidder shall state so and provide a signed statement detailing the reasons for noncompliance with the submitted bid.
The New York State Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence (OPDV) published guidance, including what gender-based violence and the workplace policies must contain, which specifically include, at a minimum, the following provisions:
Share Information: Employers must provide information regarding gender-based violence where employees can see and access it. This includes displaying the NYS Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline information and a gender-based violence and the workplace poster. When possible, materials should be available in an employee’s primary language.
Refer Employee Survivors to Services: The policy must require that the employer refer employees who disclose current or past victim status to the NYS Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline and/or a local service provider. For bidders outside of New York state, referrals should be made to a local provider or statewide hotline. While referrals are required to be provided by the employer, it is not required for the employee to access services.
Prohibit Retaliation: The policy must include a clear statement that discrimination or retaliation against employees who identify as victims or survivors of gender-based violence is prohibited.
Comply with Laws: The policy must follow state law. As a reminder for employers based in New York state, this means that the policy and employers must follow the SAFE Leave Act, which is more commonly referred to by employers as the NYS Paid Sick Leave Law, which includes qualifying reasons and protections for employees seeking to use accrued leave time for reasons related to domestic violence. The policy and employers must also follow the New York State Human Rights Law, which includes protections against sexual harassment as well as protections for victims of domestic violence (including the obligation to provide reasonable accommodations to victims of domestic violence for reasons related to the domestic violence). Employers should also follow any other relevant laws and regulations that may apply.
Offer Implementation Support: The guidance also reminds employers that OPDV is able to assist employers in developing and implementing this policy. Per the guidance, employers must provide information to supervisors and human resources about this technical assistance from OPDV.
The OPDV guidance states that covered employers should distribute the gender-based violence and the workplace policies to all employees, board members and directors upon hire and annually.
Employers that bid on competitive contracts with New York State should develop and implement a compliant gender-based violence and the workplace policy, consistent with the guidance from OPDV. Employers that contract or may contract with New York State agencies should also review any new or renewed contracts with such agencies, or other updated information from said agencies for any changes in expectations, including adoption and incorporation of this provision mandating development and implementation of a gender-based violence and the workplace policy.
OPDV has published a model policy, but we encourage employers to carefully review and customize any policy to fit their workplace.
While neither the law nor the guidance currently requires employers to provide training on this topic, employers should nevertheless consider training supervisors, human resources personnel and others who will interface with employees so that they understand the protections afforded to victims of domestic violence and comply with the employer’s relevant policies.
Colin P. Smith is an associate attorney in the Rochester office of Syracuse–based Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC. Contact him at csmith@bsk.com. Stephanie H. Fedorka is also an associate attorney with Bond, Schoeneck & King. Contact her at sfedorka@bsk.com. This article is drawn and edited from the firm’s New York Labor and Employment Law Report blog.

OPINION: Electric Mandate Delay is a First Step Toward Common Sense
New York State’s decision to suspend the implementation of the All-Electric Buildings Act is a major victory for families and businesses across the state. The measure would ban all new homes of seven stories or less from using natural gas and fossil-fuel-based equipment. It is unfortunate it took this long, but it is a relief
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York State’s decision to suspend the implementation of the All-Electric Buildings Act is a major victory for families and businesses across the state. The measure would ban all new homes of seven stories or less from using natural gas and fossil-fuel-based equipment. It is unfortunate it took this long, but it is a relief to see the voices of utility customers, builders, business owners, and cost-minded officials finally being heard.
The federal lawsuit that led to this delay raised many important points about the shortcomings of the legislation. Among those concerns are its hefty price tag and the legitimate fear that creating more hurdles for homebuyers would only damage the state’s already fragile economy.
It is also important to note that this fight is far from over. While a delay is great — the law was set to take effect on Jan. 1 — there is still a real possibility it will eventually be implemented. Remember what we saw in 2024 with congestion pricing? When faced with the controversial implementation of a tax on drivers entering lower Manhattan, Gov. Kathy Hochul first paused the program in June, citing cost concerns. But she reversed that decision less than six months later, reinstating the commuter tax safely after Election Day.
While the All-Electric Buildings delay is a pleasant surprise, the major benchmarks of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), the blueprint for the state’s energy plans, remain intact, and there are still many other costly environmental policies coming down the pipeline. For example, demanding all school buses in New York must be zero-emission by 2035 could cost as much as $15.25 billion, according to estimates. That is simply unacceptable, and we must continue to advocate for consumer choice, common sense, and cost effectiveness if we are to save our energy grid.
The Assembly Minority Conference has consistently called for reasonable, cost-effective energy policies. The mandates imposed on New Yorkers by the CLCPA, which impact everything from housing to transportation, land use and more, have been unworkable from the moment the bill was passed. Now that we have made critical progress in putting one of the most burdensome elements of the state’s energy plan on hold, we must continue to let the green energy-obsessed zealots pushing these polices know more must still be done.
It is unfathomable to demand so much from residents who are facing unprecedented taxes and outrageous utility costs. We don’t need to add to the reasons New Yorkers are fleeing. I hope the overwhelming celebration of this delay by residents, developers, businesses, and local lawmakers sends a clear message to the Albany Democrats responsible for this legislation: We need a better, more balanced approach to our energy needs. This is a start, but this fight is certainly not over.
William (Will) A. Barclay, 56, Republican, is the New York Assembly minority leader and represents the 120th New York Assembly District, which encompasses all of Oswego County, as well as parts of Jefferson and Cayuga counties.

OPINION: Political violence undermines our nation’s democracy
I was in Congress for 34 years. During that time, I attended scores, possibly hundreds of public events. They were held in all kinds of places, in nearly every circumstance that you can imagine. I can recall only one incident of potential violence. There were sometimes heated disagreements, but almost never did people reject the
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
I was in Congress for 34 years. During that time, I attended scores, possibly hundreds of public events. They were held in all kinds of places, in nearly every circumstance that you can imagine. I can recall only one incident of potential violence.
There were sometimes heated disagreements, but almost never did people reject the tradition of free speech and nonviolent discourse that our Constitution established. I think that record is a tribute to the people of Indiana, which I represented and where many of the events took place.
But that one threatening incident left an impression. Political violence is a problem in our country, and it is growing worse. Americans are deeply polarized and increasingly prone to see their political opponents as the enemy. Threats are becoming more common.
The incident that I refer to took place during a parade in a small Indiana town. I was riding in the back of a convertible, often jumping out to shake hands with voters as the car inched along the street. Suddenly, a middle-aged man emerged from the crowd and headed toward me. I could clearly see that he was carrying a knife. He was waving his hands and walking in a determined way toward the car in which I was riding. He had an angry look on his face and was shouting, but I couldn’t understand what he was saying.
As it happened, a police officer was right behind me in the parade. He saw the man and moved to intercept him and bring him to the ground. Other officers arrived promptly, and the parade went on without further incident. I never saw the assailant again. I thanked the police officer profusely, and I’m still grateful for what he did.
We have always had political violence in this country, of course. Four U.S. presidents were assassinated while in office. John F. Kennedy was killed shortly before I was first elected to Congress. Less than five years later, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. were assassinated. President Ronald Reagan was nearly assassinated by a gunman in 1981. But those incidents were rare during my time in office. They didn’t change how you did the job.
Today, elected officials are often the targets of hateful messages on social media, which can escalate into violence. Town halls and public meetings can turn angry and chaotic. Researchers have documented a large increase in the frequency of attacks on politicians.
We can’t overlook Jan. 6, 2021, when supporters of Donald Trump stormed the Capitol to try to prevent Joe Biden from being certified as president; some of them chanted, “Hang Mike Pence.” In 2017, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and three other people were wounded when a gunman fired at a group practicing for a congressional baseball game. In 2022, a man broke into the home of then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and attacked her husband with a hammer. Trump faced two assassination attempts in 2024. Most recently, the conservative activist Charlie Kirk was killed during a speaking engagement on a college campus in Utah. Three months earlier, a man stalked and killed Minnesota legislator Melissa Hortman and her husband and targeted other lawmakers and advocates.
This violence is changing how elected officials behave. Some are fearful of attending events and mingling with the public. As a result, they are less likely to hear input and have less understanding of how issues affect their constituents. The quality of their representation suffers.
This problem deserves our focused attention, but many of our elected leaders are too busy pointing fingers to address it. Discussion of political violence devolves into debates over which side, the left or the right, is to blame.
It should go without saying that political violence is wrong, no matter who is responsible. It is wrong, and it is doing grave damage to our democracy.
Lee Hamilton, 94, is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at the IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years (1965-1999), representing a district in south-central Indiana.

Ask Rusty: Consider the “Wearing Out” Factor in Deciding When to Claim SS
Dear Rusty: I enjoyed your recent articles on claiming Social Security (SS) benefits. I feel, however, any decision making should also include what I call the “wearing out” factor. Yes, financial need, health, and longevity are definite criteria for a decision. The inevitable problem (I just turned 83) is the speed at which many of
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Dear Rusty: I enjoyed your recent articles on claiming Social Security (SS) benefits. I feel, however, any decision making should also include what I call the “wearing out” factor. Yes, financial need, health, and longevity are definite criteria for a decision. The inevitable problem (I just turned 83) is the speed at which many of us descend down the back side of that hill after we hit around age 65. Yes, one might live to age 85-90 but as you age after 65, many physical limitations begin to appear. Only then does one realize their earlier retirement decision (waiting to max out SS) might not have been honestly evaluated to the extent needed. I speak from experience: after having reached 60 in excellent health, I took early retirement from work, then Social Security at 62, and glad I did so. I figure the degree of slope on the backside of that “hill” will increase with age (it did quickly for me). So, one should start enjoying a retirement life as soon as financially possible.
Signed: Glad I claimed at 62
Dear Glad I claimed at 62: Thank you very much for your excellent perspective on the “wearing out” factor. And please know that I wholeheartedly concur with your opinion that waiting for a higher Social Security benefit is not always the most prudent choice. For perspective, however, we have found that far too many people claim Social Security as soon as they are eligible at age 62 simply because “it is there,” without fully analyzing whether that is the best option considering their personal circumstances.
You are correct — enjoying your retirement life while you are still physically able is a valid consideration. And that is why we always suggest that evaluating both your financial needs as well as your health and life expectancy is important. Fulfilling one’s “bucket list” is, indeed, an important consideration and if claiming Social Security at age 62 (after evaluating all factors) enables one to do that, then that is exactly the right choice. It obviously was for you.
Age does, indeed, tend to slow us down, so if taking the SS money early means being able to enjoy life while you still can, then that is a good decision. But having more money as you age can also make your “golden years” a lot more comfortable.
As we have recently witnessed, inflation has an insidious way of reducing our financial comfort in retirement. Despite having a retirement pension from your primary working career, imagine how another 25 percent in your monthly Social Security payment — had you claimed at full retirement age instead of age 62 — would help make your senior years more comfortable.
The fact is that no one can predict how long they will live nor whether they will do so in good health. All we can do is evaluate all our options under varying circumstances and make our claiming decision based on that analysis. And that is precisely what we advocate for at the AMAC Foundation’s Social Security Service. In no way did I intend to say that claiming at 62 was never the right choice; only that everyone should look at their complete personal circumstances when deciding when to do so.
Russell Gloor is a national Social Security advisor at the AMAC Foundation, the nonprofit arm of the Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC). The 2.4-million-member AMAC says it is a senior advocacy organization. Send your questions to: ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org.
Author’s note: This article is intended for information purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. It presents the opinions and interpretations of the AMAC Foundation’s staff, trained, and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA). The NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration (SSA) or any other governmental entity.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.