I was [recently] flying from San Francisco to Orange County, California. Near the end of the short flight, I looked out the window and was able to count a minimum of 25 cargo ships anchored off the Port of Long Beach. These ships were almost all anchored with a couple moving into the clog. 

Incredibly a backlog still remains at our two busiest west coast ports in spite of Chinese government, COVID-inspired shutdowns of many of their exporters, trucking inside China significantly slowed, and some factories either shuttered or producing at less than full capacity. So the backlog could begin to worsen as factory restrictions in China begin to ease.

While not necessarily related to the ports, mothers are continuing to struggle finding baby formula in America with many resorting to crossing the southern border to purchase readily available formula in Mexico. Apparently, supply chain shortages for baby formula don’t exist south of the border, likely making the Biden administration the first in our history to force hungry Americans over the border in order to feed their children. 

While flying out to California, pilot and crew shortages were racking the country’s air-travel system. Who could have anticipated that when airlines were compelled to fire vaccine non-compliers that it would lead to disruptions in service almost a year later when the demand for air travel became robust? Oh, just about everyone, that’s who.

And then we have President Biden’s attempt to blame oil companies for the high price of gasoline and diesel. Rather than pointing fingers, the president might have looked at why refineries have been closing, even during the Trump years. 

A July 2021 report by the Institute for Energy Research details a number of refinery closures across the U.S. due to a combination of cratered oil prices in 2019 and 2020, along with costly federal government mandates on renewable fuels. The report outlines the loss of more than 700,000 barrels per day in refining capacity over the past couple of years. Many of these plants remain viable for reopening, but industry leaders are skeptical of opening new refineries.

As Chevron CEO Mike Wirth recently predicted in an interview with Bloomberg Markets, “Building a refinery is a multi-billion-dollar investment. It may take a decade. We haven’t had a refinery built in the United States since the 1970s. My personal view is that there will never be another refinery built in the United States.”

Now, President Biden wants Congress to pass band-aid legislation to end the federal gas tax for three months, lowering the price at the pump by 18 cents a gallon, while depriving the Highway Trust Fund of dollars to rebuild our nation’s highway and bridge infrastructure of one-quarter of its annual gasoline-tax revenue.

Each of the problems outlined above are in the solvable category, if President Biden wasn’t wed to the destructive green-energy agenda. Solutions include: 1) Ending California’s truck restrictions, which makes picking up containers from the ports much more expensive; 2) encouraging the re-opening of refineries and lifting all job-related firings related to not taking the COVID shot; and 3) turning the Defense Protection Act resources toward reopening currently closed refineries to increase domestic supplies of both diesel and regular gasoline. 

Unfortunately, Biden is more interested in fuel posturing rather than actually increasing capacity, because his green transformation is dependent upon record-high energy costs and broken supply chains. And that will be the Biden administration’s epitaph in history: A man dedicated to ending his nation’s economic health and prosperity.        

Rick Manning is president of Americans for Limited Government (ALG). The organization says it is a non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free-market reforms, private-property rights, and core American liberties. 

The world is seeing the effects of Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine in [contributing to] rising oil and natural-gas prices. A much more serious impact is coming: a global food catastrophe.

The war isn’t the only cause, of course. Bad weather exacerbated by climate change, including drought and floods, plays a role. So does bad government: flawed policies and programs for trade, immigration, and agriculture. High energy prices and supply chain problems compound the situation.

Regardless of the causes, this is an urgent problem that the world needs to take seriously. It is a global crisis, and it requires a global response. We need a worldwide effort, led by the United Nations (UN), to address this crisis.

According to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, the food shortage could last for years, bringing malnutrition, mass hunger, and famine for tens of millions of people. That’s a startling statement: that the problem is so serious, and we may not be able to solve it for years.

Experts say that more than 1 billion people will not be sure of getting enough to eat. The number of people classified by the World Food Program as “food insecure” has doubled in two years, to 276 million.

A decade ago, UN member nations set a goal of “zero hunger” by 2030, and some progress was being made. But the COVID-19 pandemic, with its disruption of the world economy, set back the effort. With the war in Ukraine and other issues, things are getting worse, not better.

Russia and Ukraine together supply 28 percent of the world market for wheat, 29 percent for barley, 15 percent for corn, and 75 percent for sunflower oil. But exports largely stopped when the war began in February. Last year’s Ukrainian harvests are stuck in ports, which are blockaded and mined. Storage facilities are full, with no room for this year’s harvest.

When the global food supply goes down, prices go up. For those who have access to food, inflation makes it less affordable. The World Food Program has seen costs for feeding the world’s poor rise by $70 million per month. Farmers have struggled to produce more food because of high costs for fuel, fertilizer, and pesticides.

There is a blame game going on, unfortunately, with Western leaders pointing the finger at Russia and its unprovoked war and Putin blaming the sanctions imposed by the United States and our allies. We’ve got to move on from that and get down to solving the problem.

The war isn’t the only cause of the crisis. Food production relies on moderate and predictable weather, but climate change has produced more extremes. Heavy rains delayed planting in China, an important wheat producer. Drought in the Great Plains cut into U.S. grain harvests. In East Africa, four straight rainy seasons failed for the first time in 40 years. Many food-producing countries have halted or limited their exports as a result.

Food shortages destabilize governments and cause mass migration of hungry, desperate people. Rising food prices have fueled street protests in Argentina, Indonesia, Greece, Iran, and elsewhere.

The crisis can seem overwhelming, but we can produce enough food to feed the world; we just need to deal with the barriers that keep food from getting where it needs to go. Nations can work together, for example, to prioritize getting food to the areas most at risk of famine.

We need an entirely new mindset. We have to think big about, not just reducing hunger but eliminating it. This will take a much-deeper investment by the public and private sectors. We need more research, more policy studies, and strong leadership to implement their findings.

There are few challenges that demand more of the international community than this global food crisis. The stakes are enormous, and we’ve got to come together to find solutions.        

Lee Hamilton, 91, is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years (1965-1999), representing a district in south-central Indiana.