Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
VIEWPOINT: Tax Implications Remote Workers Should Consider when Moving out of State
The workplace has gone through a significant evolution as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most commonly, there has been a major shift towards remote work, which has only accelerated because of the pandemic, resulting in states responding with more scrutiny and new policies that have triggered potential tax implications for persons seeking to move from one […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The workplace has gone through a significant evolution as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most commonly, there has been a major shift towards remote work, which has only accelerated because of the pandemic, resulting in states responding with more scrutiny and new policies that have triggered potential tax implications for persons seeking to move from one state to another. For those not moving in conjunction with retirement and/or selling a business, it is likely that wage income and distributive shares of income from an owned business may be taxed by other states, even if an individual moved to an entirely new state.
Given this, state-residency audits are becoming more prevalent and a common tactic for authorities to determine true home-state residency, which can lead to conclusions that people who moved out of state never severed their residency, leading to tax appeals and even tax litigation. One major component of any residency audit involves comparing time spent in the auditing state as compared to the state of residency, and even other states.
Your ability to defend the validity of your move will depend on how well you document your records. The most-common records that are requested on state-residency audits are cell-phone records, credit-card records, and insurance documents, and if you cannot provide them, states commonly subpoena these records directly from the phone companies, credit-card firms, and insurance companies.
A primary reason that auditors request these records is to establish where you (and your spouse) were during the years under audit. Your primary defense on a residency audit is a strong offense in terms of maintaining your own documentation. Direct-support documentation (i.e. plane tickets, gas receipts, food and lodging records) in support of your itinerary calendar is a plus. Without such an itinerary, you will be on the defensive with the state assuming any undocumented time was spent in the state.
What factors determine where your true home is?
States have a standard maxim on residency: your home state remains your home state until you have established a new state as your home state. If you move from one state and cannot establish that your domicile (home state) has changed, then the former state will argue your domicile has not changed. Your intent to change your domicile is key, but unfortunately the conclusion on domicile is really a subjective opinion. Having a majority of the indicators in your favor is beneficial. To the extent you can document these indicators, you should do so. This includes relicensing your vehicles in the new state of residency, changing your driver’s licenses, insuring of property, relocating property, changing business and personal relationships, and changing an address where mail is received. Some audits are even looking into indicators, such as the location of your primary physician and dentist, where you contribute social-media reviews, and even the physical location of pets.
The most-important indicators of the intent to change domicile includes your work, living quarters, and the location of your family. If one moved to a new state in conjunction with a new job, that’s obviously a good fact. Even a retirement in conjunction with the move is not necessarily a negative. The other two major indicators can be much thornier. Expect disagreement with state auditors when someone moves to a new state and buys or rents a new house or apartment — but does not sell the old place. Which is the home now? Likewise, situations where a spouse may live in another state may invite scrutiny as well.
How does working remotely and/or out of another state for some time affect one’s taxes?
There is no single clear tax answer, although where you are subject to state tax is basically limited to either your home (where you are living and working), and your employer base of operations.
Employers have had similar issues — both for state wage withholding as well as questions of direct tax on the employers by the states where employees are working remotely. Logic would argue that the state where you work is the state with the right to tax you, and when your location of work changes from an employer location to your home, that the tax sourcing of your wages should follow you. That unfortunately is not being universally applied. One recent example of this involves the states of Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
Massachusetts has an income tax on wages, while New Hampshire does not. Massachusetts has insisted that Massachusetts tax still applies on the wages of New Hampshire resident employees who, as a result of COVID-driven plant closures in Massachusetts, were working from home. New Hampshire sued Massachusetts and requested the U.S. Supreme Court hear the case, but it declined to do so.
It’s important to note that numerous federal bills have been introduced through the years that could limit the states’ ability to tax income of employees working remotely, or who work in multiple states, but none of those bills has achieved enough political traction to make passage likely.
Whether you work from home permanently or temporarily, due to COVID or other reason, there is currently no clear answer on state authority to tax your wages.
How can someone looking to optimize their taxes do so by moving to another state?
Your ability to minimize your taxes by moving to a state with a lower rate, or no income tax at all, depends on the nature of your income before and after the move. If your sources of income after the move are dividends, interest, and payments from a qualified retirement plan like an IRA or a 401(k) plan, the only state that can legally tax those income sources is your current state of domicile. You may be able to argue a similar position when you sell your business, but that depends on the way the business gets sold. If you sell the assets of your business, the states where the assets are located will have the right to tax the income associated with that gain.
One more item to note, if you expect a big gain on the sale of a business at some point in the future, plan your move to take place at least one year in advance of the year of sale. The state mechanics of taxing part-year residents could result in the gain being at least indirectly taxed if the gain happens in the year you move.
As these are complicated areas of taxation, it is always encouraged that individuals seek professional counsel from a qualified tax adviser.
Robin Brand, CPA, is a tax principal with The Bonadio Group. She brings more than 20 years of corporate, international and multistate tax experience to the tax practice.
Ten Onondaga County nonprofits win grant funding from county’s COVID-19 Response Fund
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Onondaga County on Wednesday awarded 11 grants to 10 organizations from its COVID-19 Response Fund. Ryan McMahon, Onondaga County executive, announced the
Oneida County’s hotel occupancy rises more than 10 percent in January
UTICA, N.Y. — Oneida County’s hotels continued to attract more guests in January compared to a year prior as the lodging industry keeps snapping back from the pandemic’s deleterious effects on business. The county’s hotel-occupancy rate (rooms sold as a percentage of rooms available) rose 10.5 percent to 39.7 percent in January from the year-ago
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
UTICA, N.Y. — Oneida County’s hotels continued to attract more guests in January compared to a year prior as the lodging industry keeps snapping back from the pandemic’s deleterious effects on business.
The county’s hotel-occupancy rate (rooms sold as a percentage of rooms available) rose 10.5 percent to 39.7 percent in January from the year-ago month. That’s according to a recent report from STR, a Tennessee–based hotel market data and analytics company.
Revenue per available room (RevPar), a key industry gauge that measures how much money hotels are bringing in per available room, jumped 28.8 percent to $43.22 in the first month of the year, compared to January 2021.
Average daily rate (or ADR), which represents the average rental rate for a sold room, increased 16.5 percent to $108.82 in Oneida County in January.
The strong January 2022 hotel-occupancy report marks the 11th straight month of significant increases in occupancy in the Mohawk Valley’s most-populated county, compared to the year-ago month. These are the first 11 months in which the year-over-year comparisons were to a month hampered by the COVID crisis. The prior year of monthly reports before that showed big declines in occupancy as the comparisons were to a pre-pandemic month.
Despite criticism, NYPA says EV charging-station effort on track
In spite of a recent critical audit by the state comptroller’s office, the New York Power Authority (NYPA) contends that it is on track to meet its goal for installed fast-charging stations for electric vehicles as part of the EVolve NY initiative. In its audit, the comptroller’s office claimed NYPA failed to install chargers where they
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
In spite of a recent critical audit by the state comptroller’s office, the New York Power Authority (NYPA) contends that it is on track to meet its goal for installed fast-charging stations for electric vehicles as part of the EVolve NY initiative.
In its audit, the comptroller’s office claimed NYPA failed to install chargers where they are most needed by the drivers of the nearly 50,000 registered electric vehicles (EVs) and left nearly half of the state’s counties without NYPA-installed charging stations.
“Compared to what was promised, the rollout of electric vehicle chargers has been a disappointment so far,” State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in a release about the audit.
NYPA, however, stipulates that it is on track to deliver the promised charging stations as outlined in EVolve program, which began in 2019. According to Paul DeMichele, NYPA Media Relations and Corporate Communication Manager, the program’s goal is to install 200 fast chargers across the state in areas where there currently aren’t any charging stations.
This differs from the audit’s main complaint that NYPA didn’t install the chargers where EVs are concentrated around the state. The audit noted Suffolk County has 7,916 EVs — more than any other county — yet has just three NYPA public charging stations. The audit also contended that Westchester County, where NYPA is based, has more NYPA public charging stations than any other county at 44. The audit also noted that 30 counties that are home to 6,189 EVs don’t have any NYPA-placed charging stations.
According to the audit, NYPA installed just 277 public EV charging ports but established another 221 workplace non-public charging ports at its own facilities and at facilities operated by businesses receiving power from NYPA’s economic development power programs.
Other findings in the audit include:
• one of the EVolve phase-one projects, including installing the 200 high-speed chargers, were completed by the 2019 deadline;
• nly 29 high-speed chargers were installed at seven locations, putting NYPA two years behind schedule; and
• YPA didn’t use charging data to determine locations that are popular and might benefit from more charging stations.
In a statement released to the media, NYPA said it will take relevant recommendations into consideration.
“Despite numerous complexities that remain in the EV charging arena, including interconnection issues, site identification, and economic challenges, NYPA has made significant progress in installing chargers across the state,” the statement read. “In fact, NYPA was successful in expanding its authority to install chargers at non-government sites. Furthermore, NYPA is actively working with state agencies and key stakeholders to identify and remove barriers that continue to hinder fast-charging deployment statewide.”
The main contention of the audit findings, DeMichele says, is that the purpose of EVolve is to install chargers where needed to ease “long-range anxiety” that might keep EV owners from traveling longer distances due to fear of not being able to charge their vehicles when needed.
NYPA didn’t need to install the chargers where people who own EVs live, he says, but rather in places where people with EVs might want to drive but do not due to anxiety about charging.
With that thought, NYPA looked to the state’s natural travel corridors to place fast chargers that can get a vehicle back on the road quickly. The Thruway (I-90) corridor was a natural choice, DeMichele says, but with a planned redesign of a number of rest stops, the Thruway Authority opted to go with another EV charging-station provider.
NYPA turned its sights toward other travel routes, DeMichele says, and is about two months away from installing its 100th charger.
Around Central New York, NYPA has several chargers installed in the Syracuse area as well as in Binghamton. Chargers are also in progress for the New Hartford, Cortland, Ithaca, and Oswego areas. More information about EVolve NY including current and upcoming charging sites can be found at evolveny.nypa.gov.
Nickels Energy Solutions gears up for busy year
CLAY, N.Y.— Nickels Energy Solutions, LLC started out the new year moving into new office space on Morgan Road and is getting ready for a busy year ahead. After the building the company previously rented office space in at 4575 Buckley Road was sold, Nickels Energy Solutions found new space just around the corner at
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
CLAY, N.Y.— Nickels Energy Solutions, LLC started out the new year moving into new office space on Morgan Road and is getting ready for a busy year ahead.
After the building the company previously rented office space in at 4575 Buckley Road was sold, Nickels Energy Solutions found new space just around the corner at 7485 Morgan Road, says Kevin Nickels, VP of sales and marketing at the solar sales and installation company.
“It gives us a little more space, so that’s good,” he notes. Matt Funiciello of JF Real Estate represented the property owner, George Powers, in the transaction. It’s a good fit, Nickels notes, as Powers’ firm, Powers Accounting Service, is already Nickels Energy Solutions’ tax professional.
The move was an easy one as the space was already set up to accommodate an office. It really just involved moving the office furniture from around the corner, Nickels says.
Now that the business is settled into the new space, the staff can hit the ground running for what promises to be a busy year for the company.
“We really do have our hands full,” Nickels says. The company is already booking installations out several months.
While many businesses and industries suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic, that was not the case for Nickels Energy Solutions, he says. The company, founded in 2015 by Nickels and his brother Steve, had a pretty strong year in 2021.
A couple of factors influenced sales, he says, including the fact that many people were working from home and were more available to meet with company representatives.
New York continues to offer attractive rebates for solar installations as well, he says, that help offset the cost of the project.
“There are so few expenses in your life you can eliminate or greatly reduce,” Nickels says. A solar system makes that an option for people looking to lower their electricity costs. Particularly with home-energy costs rising from people working from home more, it seems more people are considering projects, Nickels says. “The financial picture to go solar is as good as it’s ever been,” he adds.
The company generated more than $1 million in sales last year, Nickels says, and is pushing toward the $2 million mark. “We think we’ll be able to beat last year’s number,” he says.
One way Nickels Energy Solutions is looking to grow is by becoming more involved in the roof replacements often necessary before a solar system can be installed, Nickels says. “We want to really take ownership of the roof replacement,” he says.
While he declined to name any specific companies, he says Nickels Energy Solutions is looking to take ownership in a local roofing company. That will not only provide another revenue stream for the company, he says, but also improve costs for homeowners. On top of that, it provides Nickels with quality control to ensure the job is done the way it needs to be done.
One area where he expects the roofing business to be bustling is at homes that have had solar systems installed for 10 or more years that now need their roof replaced. Many of the companies that did those early installs are no longer around, Nickels says. Homeowners will need a company that can handle the removal and reinstallation of the solar system, as well as the roof replacement, he notes.
Nickels Energy Solutions (www.nickelsenergysolutions.com) offers roof-mounted solar systems, ground-mounted systems, solar-tracker systems, generators, battery back-up systems, and electric-vehicle charging systems. The business employs between four and 10 people, depending on its current workload.
NYISO appoints Markham as VP of operations
RENSSELAER, N.Y. — The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), a not-for-profit corporation responsible for operating the state’s bulk-electricity grid, recently promoted Aaron Markham to VP of operations, effective March 1. In this role, Markham leads the operations team, responsible for maintaining the reliability and efficiency of the wholesale energy markets and bulk-electric system. He
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
RENSSELAER, N.Y. — The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), a not-for-profit corporation responsible for operating the state’s bulk-electricity grid, recently promoted Aaron Markham to VP of operations, effective March 1.
In this role, Markham leads the operations team, responsible for maintaining the reliability and efficiency of the wholesale energy markets and bulk-electric system. He replaces Wes Yeomans, who will retire on May 1. Markham will report directly to Rick Gonzales, the NYISO’s SVP and chief operating officer.
Markham has held positions of increasing responsibility since joining the NYISO in 1999. Most recently, he served as director of grid operations, overseeing grid-operations functions, including power-system operations and dispatcher training, and regulatory compliance of reliability standards. He successfully led efforts to reliably integrate wind and solar resources into the NYISO’s dispatch programs as well as increasing real-time operator visibility into wind and solar output.
“Aaron’s skill and expertise gained over 20 years with Operations makes him the perfect choice to lead the team into the future. He’s overseen important projects to build the grid of the future and is totally committed to our mission of delivering power system reliability and competitive markets for New York in a clean energy future,” Rich Dewey, president and CEO of the NYISO, said in a news release.
Markham earned a bachelor’s degree from SUNY Polytechnic Institute and an MBA degree from the College of Saint Rose in Albany. He is active with the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC), having served as chair of the NPCC’s Task Force of Coordination Operation from 2019 to 2020.
Yeomans retires after 13 years at the NYISO and a “distinguished career in the utility industry that spans nearly 40 years,” the release stated.
“Wes Yeomans helped form the competitive energy markets when they were first created, and he’s played a critical role in shaping the NYISO. Wes was one of the first people I met when I started working in the field and since then has always been generous with his wisdom and support not only to me, but countless NYISO employees and stakeholders,” Dewey said. “His infectious spirit and entertaining style for presentations will be sorely missed. We wish him a happy, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.”
State grant programs help farmers protect soil, water quality
New York State is offering two grant programs for projects that will help the state’s farmers reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, promote energy savings, mitigate water and soil-quality concerns, and increase on-farm resiliency to climate change. The programs total $21 million, Richard Ball, commissioner of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, said in a Jan.
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York State is offering two grant programs for projects that will help the state’s farmers reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, promote energy savings, mitigate water and soil-quality concerns, and increase on-farm resiliency to climate change.
The programs total $21 million, Richard Ball, commissioner of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, said in a Jan. 31 news release.
“These grant opportunities are great news for New York’s farmers, who are continuing to lead the nation in their environmental stewardship efforts,” Ball said. “We have made an incredible impact on our farms so far through the funding of best practices and smart environmental management planning, which are helping to protect our natural resources and ensure our farms can remain competitive and profitable.”
The grants will help New York’s farmers improve sustainable practices while protecting the state’s wildlife, land, water, and air, Basil Seggos, commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, added.
Climate-resilient farming
The Climate Resilient Farming grant program helps farms reduce their operational impact on the environment and address the impacts of extreme-weather events resulting from climate change, the state says.
Through five rounds of funding to date, awarded projects are estimated to deliver the equivalent of 320,000 metric tons of CO2e-per-year emissions reductions, equal to removing 69,500 cars from the road for one year, per the release.
The 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 state budgets — through the New York State Environmental Protection Fund — provided for a combined $8 million in funding for this sixth round.
The Department of Agriculture and Markets is now accepting applications for the program, with funding available to support agricultural projects and related equipment purchases that aim to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and help agricultural producers prepare for and better manage impacts of climate change, including increased heavy-storm events, overall rainfall, and periods of drought.
The state says applications must be for one of the following project categories: Track 1 — agricultural-waste storage cover and flare systems; Track 2 — water-management systems; and Track 3 — Healthy Soils NY, soil-health management practice systems.
Track 1 has $4 million for projects will reduce methane emissions from the farm and increase the farm’s resiliency to major precipitation events. Track 2 has $2 million for projects will help prepare agricultural producers for flood events and drought. The “water management” umbrella includes best-management practices, which stabilize or reinforce conveyances, reduce flows, and/or store water. Track 3 has $2 million for projects that will improve soil health on farms and enhance a farm’s resiliency to the impacts of climate change, including benefits during times of drought, wet weather, as well as optimal growing conditions. Soil health practices can also create carbon sinks, increase water holding capacity, and improve recycling of nitrogen by crops, thereby mitigating greenhouse-gas emissions.
New York’s county soil and water conservation districts can apply on behalf of farmers for this competitive grant program. The application and additional information are available on the department’s website at https://agriculture.ny.gov/funding-opportunities.
Project proposals are due at 4:30 p.m. on March 28.
Agricultural water-quality conservation
In addition to the Climate Resilient Farming grant program funding, an additional $13 million is available to support agricultural water-quality conservation projects across the state through round 28 of the Agricultural Nonpoint Source Abatement and Control program.
The Agricultural Nonpoint program awards projects that focus on either environmental planning or the implementation of best-management practice systems to protect New York’s watersheds.
Projects include conservation measures, such as nutrient management through manure storage, vegetative buffers along streams, and conservation cover crops.
The state’s county soil and water conservation districts can apply on behalf of farmers for this competitive grant program, which is also funded through the New York State Environmental Protection Fund.
The application and additional information are available on the department’s website at https://agriculture.ny.gov/funding-opportunities.
Project proposals are due at 4:30 p.m. on May 2.
Przyklek named director of DEC’s Division of Law Enforcement
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Basil Seggos in January named Captain Karen Przyklek as the director of DEC’s Division of Law Enforcement (DLE). She is the division’s first-ever woman director. Przyklek’s promotion follows a successful 26-year career with DLE, during which “she played a vital role investigating environmental crimes, assisting the public, and
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Basil Seggos in January named Captain Karen Przyklek as the director of DEC’s Division of Law Enforcement (DLE). She is the division’s first-ever woman director.
Przyklek’s promotion follows a successful 26-year career with DLE, during which “she played a vital role investigating environmental crimes, assisting the public, and effectively enhancing the division’s work,” according to a Jan. 19 DEC news release.
“Throughout her 26 years at DEC, Director Przyklek demonstrated a steadfast commitment to protecting communities from polluters and safeguarding natural resources,” Commissioner Seggos said in the release. “I’m honored to promote to her new role as Director as she breaks the glass ceiling and I am confident that she will lead DEC’s outstanding Law Enforcement Officers with dignity and dedication.”
Przyklek began as an environmental conservation police officer patrolling New York City in 1996, and later became an investigator with the Division’s Bureau of Environmental Crimes Investigation. In 2014, Przyklek was promoted to the rank of lieutenant, followed by captain in 2019. Most recently, Przyklek served as captain of the Division’s Special Operations Group, which includes the statewide K9 Unit, Homeland Security/Radiation Unit, Wildlife Response Team, and Haz Mat Training Unit.
Przyklek helped create DLE’s Environmental Forensic Unit (EFU), one of the first such units in the nation, to collect forensic evidence at contaminated environmental and wildlife crime scenes. The EFU was deployed to multiple significant events across the state and brought the unit to the forefront of environmental sampling and evidence collection, the DEC said. Przyklek is a 9/11 first responder and assisted DEC’s response following the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Prior to joining the department, she served as a deputy with the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office in Rochester.
Oriskany Creek Basin Intermunicipal Commission launched to tackle flooding
Oneida County recently created the Oriskany Creek Basin Intermunicipal Commission to address long-term management and flood mitigation in the Oriskany Creek watershed. Currently, 13 municipalities within the creek basin have charted the commission. Other municipalities have attended preliminary commission meetings and have expressed interest in becoming members. Municipalities can join at any time by passing a resolution
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Oneida County recently created the Oriskany Creek Basin Intermunicipal Commission to address long-term management and flood mitigation in the Oriskany Creek watershed.
Currently, 13 municipalities within the creek basin have charted the commission. Other municipalities have attended preliminary commission meetings and have expressed interest in becoming members. Municipalities can join at any time by passing a resolution and entering into an intermunicipal agreement with the commission.
The commission will focus on developing the following types of projects: flood-plain restoration with green-infrastructure practices, storm-water basins, wetland enhancements, bank stabilization and repairs, regular stream maintenance, hydraulic modeling, stream mapping, stream and flood-data collection, enhanced public-access points to the creek with potential observation decks, and recreational trails, enhanced parks, and recreation areas and greenways.
“We have seen how successful the Sauquoit Creek Commission has been in managing and solving flooding issues and are now emulating that model in the Oriskany Creek Basin,” Oneida County Executive Anthony J. Picente, Jr. said in a press release. “I applaud the municipalities that have had the vision to establish this new commission, and I urge the rest in the creek basin to join us as we forge a new path forward. Oneida County continues to leave no stone unturned as we combat the flooding issues impacting our communities. These complicated problems can only be solved by working together.”
The Oneida County Planning Department provides the professional staff for the Oriskany Creek Basin Intermunicipal Commission, just as it does with Sauquoit Creek Commission. The commission has its own bylaws and membership, sets its own rules and procedures, and exists for facilitating cooperation among municipalities while addressing short- and long-term solutions for flood mitigation and watershed management.
The Oriskany Creek watershed spans two counties and includes 16 municipalities. It is 30.6 miles long and covers 147 square miles.
DiNapoli says green economy boosts jobs in New York
ALBANY, N.Y. — New York’s environment and sustainability initiatives are creating new green jobs and additional demand for existing occupations and changing the skills required to fulfill others. In total, these positions made up more than 17 percent of all jobs in the state pre-pandemic. That’s according to a new report that New York State
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
ALBANY, N.Y. — New York’s environment and sustainability initiatives are creating new green jobs and additional demand for existing occupations and changing the skills required to fulfill others.
In total, these positions made up more than 17 percent of all jobs in the state pre-pandemic.
That’s according to a new report that New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli released Feb. 23. It’s titled “Green and Growing: Employment Opportunities in New York’s Sustainable Economy.”
In it, DiNapoli urged the state to fund more educational and workforce-development programs to grow the green economy and help bolster New York’s pandemic recovery.
The comptroller’s report found that the number of jobs influenced by the green economy in New York exceeded 1 million in 2019 and 2020. The state’s efforts to promote sustainability not only encourage the creation of new jobs related to clean energy and energy efficiency, but they can also affect employment “more broadly,” requiring new skills in existing occupations and increasing demand for others, DiNapoli’s office contended. Those efforts include the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) and the Reforming the Energy Vision.
Report findings
Based on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Employment and Wages Statistics reports and the Occupational Information Network definitions of green jobs, DiNapoli’s report made the following findings.
Of the 1.7 million green jobs in New York in 2019 (17.3 percent of New York’s employment), almost 85 percent were in existing occupations facing either increased demand (37.5 percent) or the need for new or updated skills (46.8 percent). Examples include electricians, carpenters, mechanics, and software developers, operations managers, maintenance and repair, and construction laborers, DiNapoli’s office said.
New and emerging jobs — which include those in the solar industry, recycling, water, and energy — comprised 15.7 percent of all green jobs in the state, up from 9.7 percent in 2015.
Between 2015 and 2019, green jobs grew 13.2 percent, more than twice the rate of total job growth in New York (6 percent). The number of jobs in new and emerging occupations jumped 82.5 percent during this time.
Green jobs constitute a smaller share of state employment in New York than the national average (18.8 percent), and the state trails neighboring states such as Pennsylvania (20.9 percent) and New Jersey (18.5 percent), as well as the large states of Illinois (21.4 percent) and California (18.2 percent).
The number of green jobs in New York declined 31.9 percent in 2020, “more sharply” than total employment, largely because of the economic disruption caused by the pandemic.
Most programs to implement the CLCPA are still in the design stage but achieving the goals of the act will require significant changes in homes, businesses, transport, and infrastructure that will shape economic activity and jobs.
To further support workers, the current state budget established prevailing wage, project-labor agreement, and minority and women-owned business requirements for certain projects, DiNapoli’s office said.
DiNapoli recommended that policymakers ensure opportunities are available for New Yorkers seeking to upgrade their skills or take on new career paths, as well as identify actions to increase workforce training and educational measures.
“As New York State moves towards a cleaner and greener economy, it is essential that the state help address business’ need for innovative and skilled employees,” Heather Briccetti, president & CEO of the Business Council of New York State, said. “We agree with Comptroller DiNapoli that this is a tremendous opportunity for our education and workforce-development systems to partner with businesses that will build New York’s future.”
In addition, the state should bolster support to businesses to help with the transition to a green economy, including providing access to the resources needed to provide their employees with the training and skill development needed, per the report. DiNapoli called on the New York State Department of Labor to include green jobs in its “Future of Work” occupational outlook and toolkit.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.