There’s just something about a uniform that we love. Whether we wear the uniform or see it on somebody else. And there is something about conformity. Most of us love it.

Maybe you disagree.

Well, then, imagine the Yankees taking the field in slacks tonight. Wearing various tops. Maybe a few Hawaiian shirts. And floppy sun hats.

There wouldn’t be enough pages in the morning newspapers to cover the story. “Breaking news alert!” would rip into your favorite TV show. Hall of Famers would rail against this disrespect. Children would weep. The president would weigh in. Mudville would mourn.

Okay, that is an example in the extreme. So I invite you to consider something milder. Imagine one Yankee who dons a Hawaiian shirt in the sixth inning. Or, wears a purple hat. Or sports green socks.

The Yanks wouldn’t let him play. The baseball commissioner would humph and grumph. Baseball writers would tell us the guy has trashed his chances for the Hall of Fame. All because he insisted on wearing green socks!

He might draw down $25 million a year. He might drive in 120 runs and slam 50 homers a season. He can do it all wearing a Richard Simmons shirt. But if he tries it, he’ll sit on the bench. That’s how much we like uniforms and conformity.

(My father managed our town-team ball club one season. He wore uniform trousers with a pin-striped shirt and wing-tip shoes. I couldn’t show my face around town for weeks.)

Imagine a general appearing sans medals and ribbons and stripes and medallions and scrambled eggs on the bill of his hat. And don’t forget the epaulets! He would feel naked. 

The guy may be commanding a million troops. He may control a $200 billion budget. But he won’t go to bed without snapping into his be-medalled jammies. He dare not appear before Congress without 10 strips of ribbons ablaze on his chest. (This one, Senator? Why, it was for appearing under fire before this committee last year.)
Where would the Pope and church hierarchy be without their uniforms? Their skullcaps and surplices. Their cassocks and slippers. Their robes of splendor. Indeed, their Roman collars.

We have all grown accustomed to the uniforms. We expect them. We demand them. Derek Jeter, you put that sombrero away. We are not going to accept a Supreme Court judge in Bermuda shorts. The cop who pulls you over wearing jeans and a polo shirt will have to write you up for laughing at him.

I must admit we have allowed a lot of uniforms to die off. If you are old you remember when every nurse wore a white dress. Every doctor wore a tie, often a jacket. A professor would only be seen in sports jacket and tie. Leather patches on elbows were part of that uniform. Nuns were only nuns if they wore drapery.

Most lawyers still wear suits or the female equivalent. Most bankers the same. We are not upset, however, when other business types dress casually. Out of uniform in the eyes of older folks.

Not so when we check into a fancy hotel in the big city. The guy who mans the door better look like a Sigmund Romberg character. And we would never trust the one who grabs our bags if he wore sweatpants and tee-shirt.

From bus drivers to firemen to meter maids, we want ‘em in uniform. And the bigger the job, the more absurd the uniform.

From Tom…as in Morgan.

Tom Morgan writes about political, financial, and other subjects from his home near Oneonta, in addition to his radio shows and TV show. For more information about him, visit his website at www.tomasinmorgan.com

The work of policymakers is a very serious business, with a moral obligation to weigh all the consequences involved in creating or altering laws. Gov. Andrew Cuomo should have taken this into account when he forced his so-called SAFE Act on the people of New York state.

The costs of his illegal gun-grab are bad enough, but the most egregious effects of this ill-conceived measure center around our constitutional freedoms and our dignity.

It is unconscionable that so many of our friends and neighbors have been laid off at Remington Arms, [a gun manufacturer that recently announced 105 layoffs at its plant in Ilion in Herkimer County as it expands in Alabama.] It is clear that Cuomo’s agenda has cost our area greatly. I warned my legislative colleagues about the issue when the SAFE Act was being debated, but the governor and the Assembly majority failed to listen.

This was not a hypothetical conversation. I was extolling the real, dire consequences of this flawed legislation.

Law-abiding upstate New Yorkers are paying dearly for a measure that isn’t even achieving its objective of reducing gun violence. The truth of the matter is that a motivated criminal will always find a way to obtain illegal weapons.

It is my hope that legislators wake up and see that what we do in Albany affects the lives of real people, the ones we are supposed to represent and protect. I am still fighting this law with bill proposals that would repeal Cuomo’s misguided gun-control law.

The consequences of the governor’s SAFE Act have been devastating. Good jobs have been lost and devoted upstate job creators have suffered. My colleagues and I in the Assembly minority conference are working to fully restore Second Amendment rights in our state, and I hope we will be able to recover from Cuomo’s gun-grab debacle.

Marc W. Butler (R,C,I–Newport) is a New York State Assemblyman for the 118th District, which encompasses parts of Oneida, Herkimer, and St. Lawrence counties, as well as all of Hamilton and Fulton counties. Contact him at butlerm@assembly.state.ny.us