Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
What others dream about, WISE women do. On April 21, the women Igniting the Spirit of Entrepreneurship (WISE) Symposium hosted its 13th annual event. More than 900 aspiring entrepreneurs who desire to attain success and significance attended the event at the Carrier Dome on the Syracuse University campus. Over the past decade, WISE has […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
What others dream about, WISE women do. On April 21, the women Igniting the Spirit of Entrepreneurship (WISE) Symposium hosted its 13th annual event. More than 900 aspiring entrepreneurs who desire to attain success and significance attended the event at the Carrier Dome on the Syracuse University campus.
Over the past decade, WISE has been synonymous with entrepreneurial excellence and has grown to become the premier event not only for up-and-coming entrepreneurs, but also for anyone active in the business community. That includes corporate people, aspiring entrepreneurs, startups, growth business owners, and anyone interested in networking with smart, savvy women in business.
The attendees had the opportunity to gain wisdom from more than 20 business experts during workshops and speeches covering topics including productivity, leadership, building your business, breaking bad habits, managing your time, making life maps, branding, developing sales skills, using social media, and discussing how to get what you want in business and life — to name a few.
The WISE Connections Café was open all day with 28 business experts available to sit one-on-one with attendees to help them solve their business challenges and advise them on how to succeed in their business.
Walking the event, I witnessed groups of two, three, or more women networking in deep conversation with each other. I could overhear them helping each other with ideas and leads to succeed in their business.
More than 100 local vendors were on site, offering products and services to help the attendees in their businesses and in their lives. While eating lunch, it was exciting for me to see these women sit down as strangers, exchange cards, offer help to each other, and leave as friends.
Last year after the WISE Symposium, 77 percent of the attendees reported increased sales, and the event reached 7.1 million people on the Twitter hash tag #WISE2014.
I have traveled 1,500 miles and spent more than $1,600 to witness and partake of events as exciting and as productive as the WISE Symposium. It’s amazing that there is an event like this in our own backyard that can be life changing, where you can visit experts from a variety of businesses, and learn ideas and concepts that can help you to succeed — all for just $100. Wow, talk about a fantastic bargain with the opportunity to learn and grow your business. What about you and your business next year? Are you going to become WISE?
James McEntire is founder and owner of JM Sales Consulting, a company that says it provides training and coaching for those who want to excel in sales. Contact him at (315) 761-3208, or visit his website at http://jmsalesconsulting.com
Key role for board, audit committee members: Ask smart questions
As an auditor, I’m asked a wide variety of questions, and I welcome those inquiries from my clients. As in any productive relationship, communication with your auditor is not only helpful, but also the cornerstone of working together effectively. Certain communications are required, and should be proactively addressed by your auditor. Top topics of
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
As an auditor, I’m asked a wide variety of questions, and I welcome those inquiries from my clients. As in any productive relationship, communication with your auditor is not only helpful, but also the cornerstone of working together effectively.
Certain communications are required, and should be proactively addressed by your auditor. Top topics of discussion range from difficulties performing the audit, to highlights of key estimates and sensitive audit areas, to accounting adjustments resulting from audit procedures performed.
While these required communications are a good jumping-off point and can lead to an excellent dialogue, a board of directors should be prepared to ask more questions. In cases where an audit or finance committee is in place, these discussions should begin in that setting. These committees are responsible for, among other things, overseeing and evaluating the audit process and assisting the organization in addressing financial-reporting risk.
I would suggest that at a minimum, the audit committee (or finance committee if an audit committee doesn’t exist) consider asking the external auditor the following questions:
ν What are the biggest risks regarding financial reporting facing the organization in the next year and over the long term?
ν What steps do you believe the organization should take to address those risks?
ν How does your firm assess our risk-management process over financial reporting?
ν What are the high-risk areas of the audit and how were these addressed in the audit?
ν What observations do you have about management’s documentation and assessment of the internal-control structure?
ν Have you discussed any observations for improving internal controls with management? What was the substance of those conversations?
ν Are you aware of any circumstances where management failed to demonstrate commitment to the highest ethical standards?
ν What role, if any, did your firm have in management’s preparation of the financial statements?
ν Are there any areas of the financial statements that are difficult to understand or where we could provide more clarity to help a user better understand the financial statements?
ν Is there anything going on within the organization that you believe warrants further investigation?
And finally:
ν Are there any questions we have not asked that should have been asked? If so, what are those questions?
This final question is one of my favorites, and an effective tool for any oversight committee. You see, it may be difficult to cover all the bases and have a clear view of the auditor’s perspective unless you ask directly, “What are we missing?” This is a powerful tool indeed.
Some of these questions may be covered in general conversation, while others are best held for discussion in what is called an “executive session.” During an executive session, staff are excused and “those charged with governance” have the opportunity for open dialogue with the external auditor. You might ask, “What’s the point?”
Typically, auditors work with the management team to gather audit evidence, understand accounting applications, and assess the propriety of financial reporting. But auditors do not work for management. The auditor has a direct responsibility to those individuals charged with governance. Sometimes this is a board of directors or perhaps a plan trustee or business owner. It’s whoever is charged with ultimate responsibility for the organization.
During the course of communication with your auditor, you should also expect to hear about industry trends and suggestions on how things could be done better. And while no one likes to hear about an error or deficiency, let’s face it — things happen. It’s always better to know where improvements are needed and be able to take action.
Look forward to meeting with your auditor, and remember, questions are not just for fun; they are your responsibility.
Gail Kinsella is a partner in the Syracuse office of The Bonadio Group accounting firm. Contact Kinsella at gkinsella@bonadio.com
Inaction on Pension Reform is Inexcusable
Last year, taxpayers spent more than 530,000 to fund the pensions of 14 public officials convicted of felonies. Despite failing to uphold their duties to constituents, these individuals are still able to cash retirement checks funded by taxpayers. It is mind boggling that this is still the case in 2015. It is even more bewildering
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Last year, taxpayers spent more than 530,000 to fund the pensions of 14 public officials convicted of felonies. Despite failing to uphold their duties to constituents, these individuals are still able to cash retirement checks funded by taxpayers.
It is mind boggling that this is still the case in 2015. It is even more bewildering that after years of proposals and talk of reform, legislation that would strip corrupt public officials of their pensions is still on hold.
Last-minute maneuvering prolongs wait for reform
Pension-forfeiture legislation was included in the budget last month, but the Assembly majority inexplicably pulled the measure at the 11th hour. Despite assurances from the majority that the bill would be considered shortly after, there has been no movement toward a constitutional amendment to take away pensions from convicted legislators. No bill has moved to the Assembly floor and excuses abound.
The Senate already passed a bill to accomplish this much-needed ethics reform, and yet we are still needlessly waiting in the Assembly. The public deserves to trust its representatives, and with Albany’s persistent allegations of corruption and abuse, it is time we stop playing games with ethics reform and start getting serious about regaining the faith of those we are elected to serve.
The situation is wrong on every level. The longer the Assembly majority waits to act, the longer we pay the pensions of people who do not deserve it.
Recently, Assemblyman William Scarborough announced he is pleading guilty to fraud charges related to per-diem pay. This is just one of many unfortunate examples that have cropped up in recent months and reinforces the urgency to enact meaningful changes in Albany.
Taking advantage of taxpayers is shameful, and that is why I have called for a major overhaul of ethics legislation for years. My Public Officers Accountability Act (A.4617) would put term limits on legislative leaders and increase penalties for foul play, but the Assembly majority continues to hamper wholesale changes.
How many more accusations, indictments, and convictions will it take before we start using an aggressive approach to root out corruption? How much more taxpayer money needs to be taken before real reform is enacted?
No excuse for the holdup
I find new reports that the measure the Senate passed should be altered or “tightened” to be nothing short of infuriating. Media outlets have indicated that special interests are unhappy with the language in the proposal and are behind the holdup. This rhetoric is unacceptable and a poor excuse to stall a measure that is long overdue.
I will continue to fight for a speedy remedy to the growing problem of corruption. Convicted felons who chose to betray hard-working New Yorkers do not deserve a lifetime of checks from taxpayers. Any ethics reform short of removing those pensions is simply not enough.
Brian M. Kolb (R,I,C–Canandaigua) is the New York Assembly minority leader and represents the 131st Assembly District, which encompasses all of Ontario County and parts of Seneca County. Contact him at kolbb@assembly.state.ny.us
New York Must Save Medicaid from Rampant Fraud and Waste
Recently, New York State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli released a stunning audit of the state Medicaid program that showed that over the last four years more than $800 million was wasted on “improper” payments and other “questionable” transactions. This is startling news. New York’s Medicaid program is among the most expensive in the nation, costing
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Recently, New York State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli released a stunning audit of the state Medicaid program that showed that over the last four years more than $800 million was wasted on “improper” payments and other “questionable” transactions. This is startling news.
New York’s Medicaid program is among the most expensive in the nation, costing taxpayers $54 billion annually. There is no doubt that we need social safety-net programs for the poor and disabled, but, New York has adopted the Cadillac of plans. As you may know, the Medicaid program is set by the state, but is implemented by your county government. The state legislature over the decades kept adding expensive ancillary-care programs to the federally mandated minimum Medicaid program. This was generous, yet our local governments and taxpayers have been forced to foot the bill for a program with out-of-control and growing costs.
Together, the overly-generous program and fraudulent claims costing hundreds of millions is crippling a program that is indeed important to the people who truly need a social safety net. It is clear New York needs to do more to prevent fraud and waste.
We have a number of ways we can address the problem, which includes the state taking full responsibility for the costs associated with Medicaid. That would bring more accountability and incentive to reduce the costs. Additionally, I support bill A.5201, which prohibits any additional unfunded mandates regarding Medicaid unless the state increases local aid or is willing to eliminate an existing mandate of at least equal cost. These legislative solutions would address the uncontrolled growth of spending in the program.
Secondly, I support legislation that would create incentives for counties to prosecute Medicaid fraud. The bill I support, A.5113, would allow counties to collect 100 percent of the local share of Medicaid fraud prosecutions, or 10 percent of the total recovery, whichever is greater.
New York must take a tougher stance on reducing Medicaid costs and going after fraud. If we don’t get serious about the growing problems in the program, it will be so costly it will not be sustainable and could be threatened altogether. It is time for my legislative colleagues to pay attention.
Marc W. Butler (R,C,I–Newport) is a New York State Assemblyman for the 118th District, which encompasses parts of Oneida, Herkimer, and St. Lawrence counties, as well as all of Hamilton and Fulton counties. Contact him at butlerm@assembly.state.ny.us
Pietroski to depart Greater Watertown Chamber for job at Jefferson Rehabilitation Center
WATERTOWN, N.Y. — Lynn Pietroski, president and CEO of the Greater Watertown-North Country Chamber of Commerce (GWNC), will leave the organization in early July, the
PAR subsidiary wins $3.7 million Air Force subcontract
NEW HARTFORD, N.Y. — Rome Research Corp., a unit of PAR Technology Corp. (NYSE: PAR), has won a $3.7 million subcontract providing services at Wright-Patterson
Home Central to formally open renovated Vestal store
VESTAL, N.Y. — Home Central, a True Value retailer, will host a formal ribbon cutting at its newly renovated Vestal store on Thursday, May 14,
Pathfinder Q1 revenue rises 11 percent, but profit is flat
OSWEGO, N.Y. — Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: PBHC), holding company of Pathfinder Bank, on Tuesday reported that its first-quarter revenue rose by $522,000, or 10.8
New York cheese production rose in 2014, with Italian varieties up the most
New York farms produced 785 million pounds of cheese in 2014, excluding cottage cheeses. Production was up 1 percent from 2013 levels, according to the
Carrols reports narrower Q1 loss
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TAST) reported a loss from operations of $4.5 million in the first quarter that ended March 29.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.