Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Broome County hotel occupancy rate slips more than 5 percent in April, STR reports
Hotels in Broome County were less full in April compared to a year ago, according to a recent report. The hotel occupancy rate (rooms sold as a percentage of rooms available) in the county declined 5.3 percent to 55.3 percent in April from 58.4 percent in the year-ago month, according to STR, a Tennessee–based hotel […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Hotels in Broome County were less full in April compared to a year ago, according to a recent report.
The hotel occupancy rate (rooms sold as a percentage of rooms available) in the county declined 5.3 percent to 55.3 percent in April from 58.4 percent in the year-ago month, according to STR, a Tennessee–based hotel market data and analytics company. It was the third straight month the occupancy rate fell.
Revenue per available room (RevPAR), a key industry gauge that measures how much money hotels are bringing in per available room, fell 9.5 percent to $46.75 this April from $51.66 in April 2016.
Average daily rate (or ADR), which represents the average rental rate for a sold room, dipped by 4.4 percent to $84.55 from $88.44 a year earlier, per STR.
Someone is out to get you; Count on it
Most of us work at finding ways to do a better job, advance in a career, and become more successful. That’s commendable, but we may differ on how to go about getting there. While most are straightforward, tackling one challenge after another, others do it differently, and their actions leave marks that affect our success.
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Most of us work at finding ways to do a better job, advance in a career, and become more successful. That’s commendable, but we may differ on how to go about getting there. While most are straightforward, tackling one challenge after another, others do it differently, and their actions leave marks that affect our success.
Most of us can’t choose our co-workers, team members, or business associates. Nonetheless, we can avoid being blindsided by those who, often unintentionally, would throw us off course. Here are the people to look out for:
– Those who act too quickly
In school, they raced to get a seat in the front row and their hands always went up first when the teacher asked a question, even though they didn’t know the answer. Some never stop raising their hand first. They’re enthusiastic, but they can cause trouble by not taking time to think things through.
– Those who lack flexibility
We admire those who stand by their beliefs and don’t give in even when it could help to bend a little. Yet, rigidity can create roadblocks that thwart discussion and lead to hostility.
– Those who rush to get it done
They jump right in, ignoring even the most obvious red flags. They never ask questions, refuse help, and never think through tasks before moving forward. They leave a trail of trouble behind them for others to clean up.
– Those who never quite finish
Whatever the task, they drag it out (usually accompanied by questionable excuses). Then, when the deadline passes, they want more time to “check one more thing,” while co-workers are left waiting.
– Those who want to do too much
Smart and capable, they’re up for any challenge that’s handed to them. You can count on them to do a good job and do it quickly. Without knowing it, they can also create dissention among team members who resent having a “star” in their midst.
– Those who always misunderstand
It seems as if not getting something the way it was intended is a character trait with some people. No matter how clear the instructions or how detailed the discussion, someone always comes up with, “But I thought …” It isn’t so much that they see things differently as it is “reinterpreting” them so they’re comfortable with them.
– Those who are brain pickers
“I’m kind of stuck. Could you give me some ideas?” they say. You can count on it. Some are just plain lazy, but others, lacking self-confidence, feel free to take from others, and add nothing of their own.
– Those who are unendingly late
Whether it’s getting to meetings or completing assignments, some people are always late. It doesn’t appear to bother them that others depend on them and that being out of step is disruptive.
– Those who make up their own rules
In the past, there may have been more room for outliers, those who “march to a different drummer,” or “do their own thing.” But not so much in an interdependent and collaborative work environment that depends on communication, coordination, and cooperation.
– Those who set their own limits
Whenever they’re asked to take on an assignment, meet a critical deadline, or make some accommodation, they always have too much on their plate, while others find time to get the job done. Their plates may be too small for the job.
– Those who are always right
They may not know the right questions to ask, but they never run short on having the right answers. The more you attempt to convince them otherwise, the more they feel cornered and the more they resist. They’re favorite spot is standing outside the circle and criticizing.
– Those who always see flaws
Uncovering flaws is a useful skill for improving the quality of our work. But some flaw-finding can be self-serving when it’s used to improve one’s position by embarrassing or attacking others.
– Those who don’t think things through
An analytical approach takes time and, often, requires deferring decisions until more data is available. But that doesn’t satisfy those who want action. “By the time, we get around to making a decision,” they say, “it’ll be too late.” Pushing things through rather than thinking them through is dangerous.
– Those who second-guess everyone and everything
No matter how hard you try to draw them into a discussion, they sit by silently while the members of the team wrestle with the issues. It’s then that the second-guessers come to life to let it be known why it won’t work, why it will fail.
– Those who see only through their own eyes
No matter how vigorously denied, we’re all held in the clutches of biases that color our picture of the world. It’s the stuff that causes some to misunderstand and righteously reject ideas and actions that differ from their own.
– Those who equate quantity with quality
Years ago, a student came to his 10th grade civic class carrying a ridiculously thick binder filled with newspaper clippings. Today, he would download endless articles from the Internet. Either way, the results are the same: a stack of stuff but little or no understanding.
While most of those we encounter throughout our careers are helpful and supportive, there are others whose actions can cause us trouble. So, what’s the best way to avoid being blindsided and hurt? Stay alert and remember, someone is out to get you. Count on it.
John Graham of GrahamComm is a marketing and sales strategy consultant and business writer. He publishes a free monthly eBulletin, “No Nonsense Marketing & Sales Ideas.” Contact him at jgraham@grahamcomm.com, or visit johnrgraham.com
New York State acquires Salmon River, Tug Hill land for conservation, recreation, education
ALTMAR — New York State has acquired more than 6,000 acres of protected lands in Oswego County, which the state intends to target for conservation, recreation, and education. The acquisitions represent the “largest additions” to state lands in Central New York in 45 years. These areas include about 2,825 acres of lands along the Salmon
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
ALTMAR — New York State has acquired more than 6,000 acres of protected lands in Oswego County, which the state intends to target for conservation, recreation, and education.
The acquisitions represent the “largest additions” to state lands in Central New York in 45 years.
These areas include about 2,825 acres of lands along the Salmon River, “an internationally acclaimed fishing destination,” and 3,236 acres of working forestland in the nearby towns of Redfield and Orwell, the office of Gov. Andrew Cuomo said in a news release issued May 24.
This forestland acquisition will help to “secure the working landscape” of the Tug Hill region that provides “vital economic support” to local communities, the governor contends.
Cuomo made the announcement during a May 24 visit to the Salmon River Fish Hatchery at 2133 County Route 22 in Altmar.
“Protecting valuable natural resources in New York’s pristine Salmon River and Tug Hill region benefits the environment, bolsters economic opportunities for local communities and preserves the unparalleled natural beauty of the region for future generations of New Yorkers,” Cuomo contended in the release. “The Salmon River is a regional treasure, home to some of the best salmon and trout fishing in the world, and by protecting Tug Hill forestland we ensure ongoing timber resource production, safeguard the water quality of the Salmon River, and ensure public access to the region’s outdoor recreation opportunities.”
Salmon River
The newly acquired lands run from the eastern edge of the village of Pulaski upstream along sections of the river to the vicinity of the Salmon River Fish Hatchery in Altmar and the lower Salmon River reservoir in the town of Orwell.
Other large tracts of land from the acquisition are found around the upper Salmon River reservoir in the town of Redfield.
The acquisition will increase fishing access points for anglers and help facilitate improvements along the river banks to address erosion.
“The acquisition of this property by the state will be of great benefit to the public, to anglers and to those who rely on the tourism in this area, which can only increase due to addition of accesses,” Assemblyman Will Barclay said in the governor’s news release. Barclay is the Republican representative of the 120th New York Assembly District,
which encompasses most of Oswego County.
The state acquired the land as a result of a 2005 consent decree it brought, Cuomo’s office said.
The consent decree asserted that Niagara Mohawk and certain other New York utilities had violated provisions of the federal Clean Air Act in operating various power plants throughout the state.
To settle the case, Niagara Mohawk entered into an agreement to transfer land in the Salmon River area, valued at about $3 million at the time, to New York State for conservation, recreational, and educational purposes.
National Grid will continue to operate and maintain its electric transmission and distribution facilities located on these lands, which provide services to customers in upstate New York.
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) will propose regulations to protect the 1,700 acres lying adjacent to the Salmon River to preserve the river corridor by controlling camping, campfires, snowmobiles, and target shooting.
The proposed regulations “will be consistent” with public use of the property while owned by National Grid, the release stated.
DEC also expects to establish new trails along the property, constructing new parking areas, and increasing hunting and trapping opportunities on lands that will be designated state forests. DEC is developing a recreation and restoration master plan for the Salmon River lands, which will be released for public comment later this year. The environmental agency has already announced $500,000 in stream restoration work along the river corridor.
Kendall property, Tug Hill forestland
A priority conservation area in the state’s Open Space Plan, the 3,236 acre Kendall property located north of the Salmon River reservoir, is embedded in a landscape with existing state lands and working forest easements.
The Conservation Fund purchased the land in 2015 at New York State’s request through its Working Forest Fund with generous support from the Richard King Mellon Foundation.
DEC recently took ownership of the Kendall property using $4.75 million from the state’s Environmental Protection Fund.
The new state-forest land will help to stem the tide of rural land division, which typically costs towns more money in services than they receive in property taxes, the state contends. State ownership of working forests like Kendall is supported by towns because it helps retain traditional access and jobs while protecting town budgets, it notes.
Located within Audubon’s Tug Hill important bird area, the forestland also supports nearby wetlands that provide habitat to a variety of migratory birds.
Transforming New York’s Power Grid for a Clean-Energy Future
In the past decade, New York State has cemented itself as a national leader on energy policy and environmental quality with initiatives like the Clean Energy Standard, Reforming the Energy Vision, and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Combined with competitive electricity markets that drive efficiency and support the growth of renewable resources, these initiatives are
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
In the past decade, New York State has cemented itself as a national leader on energy policy and environmental quality with initiatives like the Clean Energy Standard, Reforming the Energy Vision, and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Combined with competitive electricity markets that drive efficiency and support the growth of renewable resources, these initiatives are improving air quality and expanding New York’s clean-energy industry.
But as the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) looks to a cleaner-energy future in New York, we see the emerging story of our electric system as one of a grid characterized by stark regional differences that can be thought of as a tale of two grids. Not surprisingly, there are distinct differences between Upstate and downstate in terms of power resources and consumer demand.
We have an abundance of renewable-energy resources and generation capacity in upstate New York, yet relatively low demand. In contrast, the downstate region has a higher concentration of fossil-fuel generators and significantly higher demand, using 66 percent of the state’s electric energy annually.
In fact, nearly 75 percent of the electricity generated in the downstate region last year was produced by fossil-fuel resources, while about 85 percent of electricity generated Upstate came from nuclear, hydro, and wind resources with no carbon emissions. Our recently released Power Trends 2017 report highlights this fundamental problem for New York: longstanding transmission constraints between the two regions prevent more clean energy produced in Upstate from reaching the broader, statewide market.
This physical constraint on the grid is also giving rise to two markets. The low cost of natural gas to fuel generation and the continued growth of clean-energy resources Upstate are keeping market prices in this region low. As a result, other resources are finding it difficult to compete, raising concerns that price signals will deter investors from building new generation or upgrading existing plants to support reliable operations.
Power Trends also highlights the emergence of a much different grid with the growth of smaller, more distributed energy resources, typically located on a customer’s premises. While these resources usually supply the customer’s electricity needs, our “distributed energy resources roadmap” highlights how on-site electricity can also provide services to the “bigger grid,” and the larger wholesale market.
A cleaner, greener, integrated grid — one that includes both central power station and distributed resources will depend on a modernized, upgraded, and expanded transmission system. Upgraded transmission capability is vital to meeting the state’s renewable public policy goals and efficiently moving power to address regional power needs.
Transmission enhancements will also relieve constraints on the system, making more effective use of current and future renewable resources. Further, strategic transmission investments will enable upstate resources to better serve a broader market — providing benefits such as a more resilient grid, access to more diverse energy resources, and more efficient market competition.
The power grid has been described as the greatest engineering achievement of the 20th century, providing the foundation upon which our modern life and economy is built. Today, our main focus at the NYISO is ensuring this engineering marvel will meet the emerging challenges of the 21st century.
Working closely with utilities, generators, regulators, and industry stakeholders, we are transforming New York’s power grid for the better — both Upstate and downstate. At the NYISO, we’re proud to be a part of the change that will determine our state’s clean-energy future.
Brad Jones is president and CEO of the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), an independent nonprofit company that operates New York’s high-voltage power grid and manages competitive wholesale electricity markets.
ConMed to pay quarterly dividend of 20 cents in July
UTICA — ConMed Corp. (NASDAQ: CNMD), a Utica–based surgical-device maker, recently announced that its board of directors has declared a cash dividend of 20 cents a share for the latest quarter. The dividend is payable on July 5 to all shareholders of record as of June 15, according to a company news release. At its
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
UTICA — ConMed Corp. (NASDAQ: CNMD), a Utica–based surgical-device maker, recently announced that its board of directors has declared a cash dividend of 20
cents a share for the latest quarter.
The dividend is payable on July 5 to all shareholders of record as of June 15, according to a company news release.
At its current stock price, the dividend yields about 1.6 percent on an annual basis.
ConMed specializes in surgical devices and equipment for minimally invasive procedures. The company’s products are used by surgeons and physicians in a variety of specialties, including orthopedics, general surgery, gynecology, neurosurgery, and gastroenterology.
The firm has a direct selling presence in 17 countries and international sales account for about half of its total sales. Headquartered in Utica, ConMed employs about 3,300 people worldwide.
ConMed reported a net loss of $4.5 million in the first quarter of this year, compared to a net loss of $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2016. The company generated nearly $187 million in revenue in the latest quarter.
Exploring a Benefit Corporation for your Business Venture
I have recently seen rising interest on the part of entrepreneurs in filing as a benefit corporation. However, upon discussing the choice, I have come to realize that many need more information about the basics of this type of corporate entity. The following is a basic beginner’s guide to the benefit corporation. The whys of
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
I have recently seen rising interest on the part of entrepreneurs in filing as a benefit corporation. However, upon discussing the choice, I have come to realize that many need more information about the basics of this type of corporate entity. The following is a basic beginner’s guide to the benefit corporation.
The whys of it
Entrepreneurs are increasingly interested in doing well by doing good. They want to bring together the idea that a business can have a positive impact on social and environmental goals whilst also turning a profit. They are ultimately looking for the tax benefits and legal protections of incorporation while concurrently holding themselves to a higher standard on social and environmental issues.
Realistically, traditional for-profits and nonprofits are not designed for the simultaneous pursuit of social, environmental, and financial bottom lines (also known as the “Triple Bottom Line”). The conventional idea of a business is that its sole purpose is to create value for shareholders — the pursuit of profit and infinite growth regardless of the cost to society or the environment. Traditional corporations can form for any lawful purpose but have no explicit public-benefit requirement.
The benefit corporation expands a company’s purview to take into consideration the interests of all stakeholders, not just shareholders. This in turn helps to ensure that the core values of the business are maintained for the long-term. This is not to say that these entrepreneurs are not interested in profit, but rather in balancing the firm’s fiduciary duty between its shareholders and stakeholders.
Reasons entrepreneurs have given for consideration of benefit-corporation status cover a broad range of topics including: leading a movement by voluntarily complying to higher standards, differentiating from competitors, attracting and engaging the workforce (especially those currently age 35 and under), and measuring their performance against peers.
Where can benefit corporations form?
Benefit corporations are guided by state law. Currently 31 states have enacted benefit corporation laws including New York State (NYS) which enacted legislation in 2011. Benefit-corporation filings in this state are overseen by the Department of State, Division of Corporations.
The division says that benefit corporations are formed for the purpose of creating a “general public benefit.” General public benefit is further defined as “material positive impact on society and the environment, taken as a whole, as assessed against a third-party standard, from the business and operations of a benefit corporation.” Ultimately, the benefit corporation, not the state, has the responsibility to determine what is deemed a material positive benefit.
How you go about forming a benefit corporation in NYS?
Following are the simplified steps to forming a benefit corporation in NYS.
1. Consider entity choice and what it means for taxation
While the benefit corporation has the feel of a hybrid legal entity that blends elements of nonprofit and for-profit corporations it is taxed like a traditional corporation and in NYS your underlying entity type will be either an S-corporation or C-corporation.
2. Consider legal requirements that may prevent filing as a benefit corporation
Verify your industry does not have requirements that would prevent it from opting to be a benefit corporation (typical examples would be professional corporations including attorney, insurance, or doctor’s practice).
3. Review and understand governance requirements
Understand ongoing governance issues such as the mandatory annual filing requirements affecting benefit corporations. In NYS, benefit corporations must file an annual report within 120 days of the end of the corporation’s fiscal year-end with the New York Department of State.
4. Prepare and file forms to incorporate as a benefit corporation
Online and paper filings are allowed for benefit-corporation formation in NYS and currently require a $125 fee for incorporation.
An existing corporation has the option to convert to a benefit corporation by amending its certificate of incorporation. For more information, visit the Department of State, Divisions of Corporations website: https://www.dos.ny.gov/corps/index.html.
Certain circumstances may dictate that your company become or stay an LLC (limited-liability corporation). While an LLC is not an entity type that can be used to file as a benefit corporation, the LLC has the option to make an amendment to its articles of incorporation. This allows the intent to operate under the spirit of a benefit corporation.
B-Corp certification vs. benefit corporation
Be aware that B-Corporation certification is different from benefit-corporation status. B-Corp certification is a third-party designation offered by B-Lab.
Karen Livingston is a state-certified business advisor at the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) at Onondaga Community College. Contact her at livingsk@sunyocc.edu
Author’s note: The information contained in this article does not constitute legal advice. It is provided solely as a reference. You should consult with a legal representative or accountant before taking any actions.
State issues plan to cut methane emissions
New York’s methane-reduction plan includes 25 steps that seek to reduce methane emissions from the landfill, oil and gas, and agricultural sectors across the state. Gov. Andrew Cuomo released the plan on May 17. The governor wants New York to implement the actions by 2020 as part of the state’s strategy to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York’s methane-reduction plan includes 25 steps that seek to reduce methane emissions from the landfill, oil and gas, and agricultural sectors across the state.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo released the plan on May 17.
The governor wants New York to implement the actions by 2020 as part of the state’s strategy to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050, from 1990 levels, Cuomo’s office said.
The New York State Departments of Environmental Conservation, Agriculture and Markets, Public Service, and the Energy Research and Development Authority, in conjunction with the New York State Soil & Water Conservation Committee, will implement the plan.
“With this action, New York will continue to shrink our carbon footprint by reducing emissions that contribute to climate change,” Cuomo said in a news release.
About the plan
The methane-reduction plan will address many sources of methane emissions including the pursuit of methane reductions at both active and inactive landfills.
Cuomo also wants to limit methane emissions from new and existing oil and gas wells.
In addition, the plan would support energy production or capture and combustion of methane gas at farms and landfills.
It would also develop methane-reduction criteria in state-funded programs for agriculture.
The plan would also deploy methane-detection systems to enhance detection of leaks in residential areas and utilize incentive programs for addressing methane leakage in utility and customer-owned pipelines that prioritize safety and climate change mitigation.
Methane is second only to carbon dioxide in its contribution to climate change, Cuomo’s office said. Representing almost 10 percent of the state’s annual greenhouse-gas emissions, methane reduction is a “key piece” of New York’s policies to address the “risks” from climate change, it added.
The plan seeks to lower methane emissions; establish “more robust” monitoring methods so that methane sources can be fully documented; increase support and information sharing among agencies and partners; and seek stakeholder involvement to “enhance” current regulatory and funding efforts.
Federal activity
The state’s methane-reduction plan comes at a time when federal environmental regulators are taking a different approach, taking steps to reverse regulations set up by the previous administration.
In recent weeks, the federal government has moved to “abandon” three major efforts to address methane pollution, Cuomo’s office said.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 2 dropped its development of a regulatory approach to reduce methane emissions from existing oil and gas wells. EPA has also indicated that the agency is reconsidering its 2016 standards limiting emissions from new oil and gas development.
In addition, the federal government is seeking to repeal or “weaken” U.S. Department of Interior rules to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas projects on federal lands,
Cuomo’s office said.
DEC launches I BIRD NY initiative to promote bird-watching
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) recently announced the launch of I BIRD NY, an initiative to increase access to the state’s natural resources and promote low-cost opportunities to connect with nature. The I BIRD NY program launch took place at the Utica Marsh Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Oneida County where
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) recently announced the launch of I BIRD NY, an initiative to increase access to the state’s natural resources and promote low-cost opportunities to connect with nature.
The I BIRD NY program launch took place at the Utica Marsh Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Oneida County where DEC unveiled recent improvements at the marsh and the designs for a new observation viewing tower, according to a department news release. The WMA is an urban wetland that has a mixture of cattail wetlands, wet meadows, open water pools, and flooded willows that provide a marsh habitat for a variety of plants and animals, especially birds.
New York state is home to an array of habitat that supports more than 450 different bird species. Bird-watching is one of the fastest growing outdoor recreational activities that can be enjoyed by people of all ages and experiences in any community, the state agency contends.
The I BIRD NY program is one of several state initiatives to boost access to green spaces, including focus on opportunities close to urban and suburban areas.
“New York State Parks offers rich natural habitats for interesting and unique birds,” State Parks Commissioner Rose Harvey said in the release.
The I BIRD NY announcement came on the heels of International Migratory Bird Day, a day to celebrate the importance of stopover sites and their habitats to birds migrating between their nesting and wintering sites.
“Seated at the foot of the Adirondacks, the Mohawk Valley is fortunate to have many serene locations like the Utica Marsh that allow the public to really enjoy the exceptional beauty and natural diversity of our region,” State Senator Joseph Griffo said in the release.
Albany’s Most Ridiculous: 10 Bills You Won’t Believe They Proposed
While New Yorkers have been struggling to make ends meet, get to work, and even trust their government, legislators have spent time crafting proposals so ridiculous they’re laughable. Reclaim New York sifted through thousands of bills, and found more than two dozen frivolous pieces of legislation to boil down to the 10 most ridiculous. “New
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
While New Yorkers have been struggling to make ends meet, get to work, and even trust their government, legislators have spent time crafting proposals so ridiculous they’re laughable.
Reclaim New York sifted through thousands of bills, and found more than two dozen frivolous pieces of legislation to boil down to the 10 most ridiculous.
“New Yorkers want financial relief and their faith restored in government,” Brandon Muir, Reclaim New York executive director said. “But instead of addressing these concerns, the legislature is spinning its wheels on measures that give tax breaks to bees, or allow ballot selfies.”
Here are the top 10 most ridiculous proposals from Albany this legislative session:
10. Telework Task Force, A.45
The idea that New Yorkers need six government agencies, and legislative liaisons, to band together in yet another task force to tell them whether telework is a helpful practice or not is absurd.
9. No animal “death drones,” A.1437
This legislation would head off the wildlife version of Terminator, and prevent people from using unmanned drones to hunt and kill animals.
8. Tax break for bees, A.37
No offense to bees, but our tax code is already one of the most complicated in the U.S. before adding a sales-tax exemption for the sale of bees. Human New Yorkers are getting stung every day by high taxes, and too many flee out of state, but politicians might give bees a break.
Bee more serious Albany.
7. Ballot selfies, A.5215
Legislators take a shot at grabbing the social-media spotlight with a bill to make it legal to take selfies in the voting booth.
Your vote is what matters, not the “like” count of your social-media post.
6. Making it easier to officiate a wedding, A.1137, and S.5858
This could allow the state to give individuals a license for just one day to officiate a wedding. This would allow your best friends to upgrade from embarrassing you during reception speeches, and get started during the official ceremony.
5. Life & death measures for some animals, A.7778, A.7908, A.5586
If you’re a mourning dove, there’s a bill that would declare you a migratory game bird, which means you can be legally hunted — and now you can live up to the name.
The north cricket frog has been living the protected life on the endangered species list, but there’s a proposal to return them to the state of nature. Gulp.
And if you’re a pheasant who’d like a larger family, the state may not be of help if it quits participating in artificial pheasant propagation activities.
4. Seafood marketing task force, A.6893
Albany can’t possibly think a bigger task force is going to help seafood businesses escape the jaws of the nation’s second-worst business-tax environment. The state might think about making New York’s waters more friendly with tax relief and regulatory reform, rather than acting fishy with a showy task force.
3. Children’s book contest, A.47
This bill would direct the commissioner of education to run a contest every two years to pick the best children’s book — it’s the literary version of the state’s failed “economic development” strategy. The “Hunger Games” should win every time, which means New Yorkers lose.
Meanwhile, the state’s students need better basic education, not bells and whistles, as New York’s middle-schoolers have fallen to 34th in national reading and math rankings.
2. Declare “black dirt” the state dirt, A.7854, S.989
This bill would also declare the black dirt region as “home to the most fertile soil.” The state’s opinion on soil fertility isn’t going to make a difference. Making our grocery shopping costs lower would make a difference though.
New York already has a state dirt, “Honeoye.” The legislature didn’t get to pick that one though, so now it is considering going rogue and selecting its own dirt.
1. Declare sweet corn the state vegetable, A.6493, S.3556
There’s a corny joke here somewhere… Having a designated state vegetable is frivolous enough on its own, but figuring out the state vegetable has been an ongoing drama for six years. That is still a lot less time than corruption has been a problem at the Capitol.
Only Albany could be so tasteless to table ethics reform, and wrangle with a question like, sweet corn or onion? Meanwhile most other states don’t have a state vegetable, and Washington’s “Walla Walla sweet onion” will never be beaten.
Reclaim New York (www.reclaimnewyork.org) says it is a nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that “empowers citizens, through education and civic engagement, to make New York a better place to live, work, and raise a family.” This article is drawn from a news release that the organization issued on May 26.
Disbelief in our Political System
I’ve had many conversations recently that convince me our country is divided into two political camps separated by a deep and uncomfortably wide gap. No, I’m not talking about liberals and conservatives, or pro- and anti-Trump voters. I’m talking about people who believe in politics and our political system, and people who don’t. I’ve found
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
I’ve had many conversations recently that convince me our country is divided into two political camps separated by a deep and uncomfortably wide gap. No, I’m not talking about liberals and conservatives, or pro- and anti-Trump voters. I’m talking about people who believe in politics and our political system, and people who don’t.
I’ve found the view of disbelief in our political system expressed most frequently among young people. I’ve spent some uncomfortable hours serving as a human pincushion for their pointed barbs about the system in which they’ve grown up.
They doubt our political institutions can be made to work, are suspicious of elected officials in general, and don’t believe that our democratic institutions can solve the problems faced by the country or help them as individuals. They’re disheartened by political polarization, by the dominant and excessive role of money in the process, and by the seemingly impregnable influence of special interests on the course of policy.
They’re convinced that people in power place their own interests ahead of the country’s interests. They certainly don’t see politics as an uplifting pursuit; I hear the word “messy” a lot, not as an objectively descriptive term, but as an expression of ethical disapproval.
They have a point. Yet I still consider politics a worthy profession. It can be pursued in a manner that deserves respect, even admiration. Sure, politics is “messy,” but not because it’s tainted or morally bankrupt. It’s messy because it often reflects deep-seated disagreements that are hard to resolve, with merit on both sides.
Politics is rarely a struggle between good and evil; it’s how we Americans try to make the country work better. It’s a means of resolving our differences through dialogue and compromise, rather than through ideological battle or pitched warfare.
So, I find myself wondering how those of my persuasion might win these young people over. Discourse matters, obviously. Tolerance of others’ views does, too. And I consider the 240 years of our history, despite all the obvious blemishes, to make a pretty good case for the political system’s accomplishments. Above all, we must encourage young people’s engagement with the problems we confront.
Those of us who believe in the system must shoulder the burden of persuasion. If we lose the argument and the next generation turns away, we face dangers and risks — chaos, authoritarianism — that are far worse than what we face now.
Lee Hamilton is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at the IU School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years, representing a district in south central Indiana.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.