In an attempt to get ahead of the New York Legislature, on Jan. 15, Gov. Andrew Cuomo gave his annual budget address. He laid out what most would consider a very liberal agenda. Sadly, there was nothing in his address that offers relief to the overtaxed citizens of upstate New York or to stem the continued outward migration of people from New York state. In fact, some of Cuomo’s proposal will exacerbate the problems we face in New York.

For reasons that are unclear, in his $175 billion budget proposal, the governor proposes to cut $59 million in Aid and Incentives to Municipalities known as AIM funding. Our local governments are already hamstrung by mandates coming out of Albany and to propose cutting their state funding seems vindictive more than anything else.

Municipalities have already set their 2019 budgets so how they will make up for the loss of aid is unclear. Further, even if their budgets had not been completed it hardly seems like a positive solution for them to go back to our already overburdened property tax payers for more revenue. It will be imperative for the state legislature to reject these cuts and at the very least provide funding for AIM at last year’s levels.

Gov. Cuomo is also proposing to eliminate “Extreme Winter Recovery” funding that last year provided $65 million in funding for our communities to help with the cost of dealing with harsh winter-weather conditions. One of the challenges we have Upstate compared to Downstate or compared to municipalities in warmer climates is the cost of snow plowing, snow removal, and road maintenance due to cold, snowy weather. I was pleased last year when the governor and the legislature recognized these additional costs and provided funding to help municipalities deal with the expense. Unfortunately, winter is not going away and these expenses will be here again this year. 

It was also disappointing that the governor included no increase in community college aid. We are fortunate to have Cayuga Community College, Onondaga Community College, and Jefferson Community College in our area, which financially relies on state and local support. By keeping the funding at last year’s level, this will presumably increase the cost on our counties and the students that attend. Additionally, in his higher education budget proposal Gov. Cuomo allocates $27 million to fund the newly enacted Dream Act. Under the Dream Act, the state will provide financial aid to undocumented-immigrant students. The priorities here are troubling, especially considering the hardship that many families face in sending their children to college. 

Without a doubt this will be a challenging year and conceivably a difficult budget cycle. Nevertheless, as ranking member on the Ways and Means Committee, during the budget hearings and the process going forward, my focus will remain on what we can do to lower taxes, improve the business climate, and provide the necessary support to assist our local communities and schools.        

William (Will) A. Barclay is the Republican representative of the 120th New York Assembly District, which encompasses most of Oswego County, including the cities of Oswego and Fulton, as well as the town of Lysander in Onondaga County and town of Ellisburg in Jefferson County. Contact him at barclaw@assembly.state.ny.us or (315) 598-5185.

All the great politicians and legislators I’ve known over the course of my career in Congress were different. They were masters of the rules, or unassailably knowledgeable about a given issue, or supremely watchable orators. But they also shared key traits that I wish more elected officials possessed.

 For starters, the great politicians I’ve met enjoyed the game, and they worked on the skills needed to play it well. They were good speakers and adroit persuaders, whether on the floor of the Congress or sitting in a supporter’s living room with a dozen strangers.

 They also embraced a life in politics because they believed they could make a difference. They had confidence in themselves, their ideas, and their ability to find their way out of tough spots. They were not dismayed by the give and take of politics — if anything, they relished it.

The great politicians I knew could master legislative detail. Serious legislating requires mind-numbing work. Effective legislators not only don’t mind this, they see it as an opportunity to put their imprint on the law.

 Many of the strongest political leaders I met over the years had a passion for leadership. We have 435 members of the House of Representatives and 100 senators; they’re already leaders. So the people who in turn rose to the top of those ranks had something extra — they wanted to be leaders of the leaders.

 And not just in Congress. Their attitude toward the presidents they served with was interesting. They had a deep respect for the office of the presidency, but they insisted that the president display equal respect for Congress. They took the idea of a co-equal branch of government seriously.

 They applied the same sensibility to their colleagues. They were serious about strengthening the institution from the inside. They sought to build its capabilities — for research and analysis, for oversight, and for all the capabilities a branch of government charged with making policy might need.        

Lee Hamilton is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at the IU School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years, representing a district in south central Indiana.