On Dec. 16, the law allowing undocumented immigrants the ability to obtain a New York State driver’s license went into effect. The fact that this is now the law is a stunning reversal from 12 years ago when then-

Gov. Elliot Spitzer proposed the measure. Some may recall, Spitzer dropped the proposal due to overwhelming opposition to it from people across the political spectrum — including opposition from leaders in his own party such as Hillary Clinton. 

While a large majority of New Yorkers still opposed the law in 2019, in June the New York City–dominated legislature along with Gov. Cuomo proceeded to pass the law despite substantial opposition from upstate legislators.

While many people oppose the law simply on the basis that people who break the law coming to America should not be rewarded with driving privileges, there are other substantive problems beyond just that. One is national security. In order for an undocumented immigrant to obtain a license in New York, he or she must show “proof of identity.” Proof of identity includes among other things: (1) an unexpired foreign passport from the applicant’s country of citizenship, or (2) a valid foreign driver’s license that includes a photo image of the applicant which is either unexpired or expired for less than 24 months. It is then up to the motor vehicle clerk to determine the validity of the proof of identity prior to issuing the license. While we have professional motor vehicle clerks in our state, it is unlikely that any of them are experts on foreign identification. How are they to judge the authenticity of a foreign passport or driver’s license? It is not a stretch to imagine someone who wants to do harm to our country being able to obtain official government identification like a New York driver’s license by exploiting this weakness in the system. Once obtaining the New York driver’s license, one could use it as identification to undertake any sort of nefarious deeds against our country.

Another legitimate concern about allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses is that it could facilitate voter fraud. Currently, state law requires that an application for a driver’s license include a voter-registration application where an applicant simply has to affirm that he or she is a citizen of the United States. That voter registration is then sent to the county board of elections where the applicant is then registered to vote. When applying for a driver’s license, if inclined, an undocumented immigrant could simply affirm that he or she is an American citizen and then eventually be registered to vote. Moreover, once obtaining a driver’s license an undocumented immigrant, if inclined, could go to the board of elections and use the driver’s license as identification to register to vote. While it is true that by affirming that they are American citizens an undocumented immigrant would be breaking the law, it would be highly difficult, especially once they have obtained a driver’s license, for anyone to know their citizenship status or prove it otherwise, especially following an election.

This law also has a number of other problems such as imposition of obstacles on the investigatory powers of law enforcement and the infringement on federal authorities’ ability to enforce immigration laws. However, what might grind on people the most is the seemingly unfairness of the law. Every year, some 700,000 immigrants obtain legal citizenship while millions more are allowed legal entry into our country. By permitting undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses it is unfair to those who have legally gone through the process of naturalization. As a result, some might be less inclined to seek citizenship if they know they can get all the advantages of citizenship without having to bother with naturalization.

America is a nation of immigrants and we should be proud of our immigrant heritage. However, that doesn’t mean we, as a state, should try to confer privileges to anyone in the state regardless of their citizenship status. The idea of providing undocumented immigrants with driver’s licenses was a bad idea when Gov. Spitzer proposed it 12 years ago and it continues to be bad idea now that the state has adopted it.      

William (Will) A. Barclay is the Republican representative of the 120th New York Assembly District, which encompasses most of Oswego County, including the cities of Oswego and Fulton, as well as the town of Lysander in Onondaga County and town of Ellisburg in Jefferson County. Contact him at barclaw@assembly.state.ny.us or (315) 598-5185.

Not long ago, I was in a meeting to talk about a public-policy issue. It was complex, and as we considered the various angles I thought about what it would take to translate talk into change on the ground. I wasn’t analyzing the politics of it — I was focused on the types of people who would have to roll up their sleeves. 

 What I came away with was a list of skills, none of them unusual, but all of them vital for getting things done in the increasingly complicated world that government faces. It was a long list, including everything from a legislative draftsman to lawyers and budget experts to subject-matter experts, engineers, businesspeople, and PR experts. 

 My point is that to make our system and this country work, we need experts and competent bureaucrats to deal with the problems that come cascading down on government. And here’s what I can tell you, after decades of close contact with federal civil servants: We have them. By and large, this country is served by an extremely professional and dedicated group of public employees. 

 Which is why I have never shared the contempt and outright hostility toward federal bureaucrats that is so often expressed in the public arena these days. They deal with very tough problems and they’re usually good at what they do. They just don’t toot their own horns about it.

 This was on full display in the recent House Intelligence Committee hearings on impeachment. As New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote recently, “[T]he civil servant witnesses answering questions inspired a lot more confidence than the elected officials who were asking them.” He went on to quote political scientist Hugh Heclo, “It is when you deal with someone who does not perform in a ‘professional’ manner that you learn to appreciate those who do.”

 This doesn’t mean that there aren’t some bad apples within the bureaucracy. There always are, but they’re rare. Attacking cabinet officials and civil-service employees publicly, the way President Trump seems to enjoy doing, seems counter-productive. These are, after all, the very people he has to depend on to move his programs forward.

 In the face of the many challenges we confront, the professionalism, talent, and competence of our civil servants matter. We’ve been fortunate: many of them have withstood attacks on themselves and the systems they depend on for support. So far anyway.        

Lee Hamilton, 88, is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years (1965-1999), representing a district in south central Indiana.