Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.

Syracuse-ESF team places in top 4 of DOE Solar Decathlon Design Challenge
SYRACUSE — A team of students from Syracuse University and the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF) earned an honorable mention in the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Solar Decathlon Design Challenge. It’s a collegiate competition that has student teams designing and building “highly efficient and innovative” structures powered by renewable energy. A […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — A team of students from Syracuse University and the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF) earned an honorable mention in the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Solar Decathlon Design Challenge.
It’s a collegiate competition that has student teams designing and building “highly efficient and innovative” structures powered by renewable energy.
A total of 45 finalist teams from 31 colleges and universities competed virtually between April 17 and 19 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Students submitted their projects and presentations online while a jury of industry leaders conducted question-and-answer sessions through virtual conferencing, Syracuse University said in a May 18 news release.
The combined Syracuse/ESF Syracuse Energy Efficient Design (SEED) team was selected as one of the top four out of 18 teams in the mixed-use, multifamily division and awarded an honorable mention for its project, Our Home at Smokey Hollow.
Project details
For this year’s project, the two-school team of 20 undergraduates and graduate students partnered with Christopher Community, Inc. to create a mixed-use, assisted-living facility for young adults with mild to severe autism.
Christopher Community Inc. is a Syracuse–based nonprofit organization that specializes in developing and operating affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families.
Located in Baldwinsville, the 11-unit structure was designed to provide all associated care and therapy services under the same roof. It includes living space for permanent support staff and is complaint with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Syracuse said.
Estimated to cost $6.2 million, the parents of prospective residents will privately finance the project through a combination of internal support, mortgages, housing grants, and donations from local businesses.
In order to meet deadlines, team members implemented an integrated-design approach by dividing into five sub-teams based on their studies and competition guidelines — architecture, energy, engineering, finance, and operations.
Students came from seven different majors, including architecture, construction management, environmental and mechanical engineering, and landscape architecture.
“The multi-disciplinary team enabled interaction among various disciplines and the knowledge gained from that is unparalleled,” said Vedyun Mishra, architectural team lead who is set to graduate in 2021.
With a large team size, the sub-team leads also decided it was important to have “consistent input and guidance” from knowledgeable faculty, so they enlisted the help of advisors. Nina Sharifi and Daekwon Park, assistant professors in the School of Architecture, and Paul Crovella, sustainable construction management instructor at SUNY-ESF, mentored the team, Syracuse University said.
The team on May 3 presented its final report to the parents and the developer, Mishra said in an email message that Syracuse University forwarded to CNYBJ. The design and concepts will form the basis and framework for planning documents that Christopher Community Inc.’s design team will develop before construction begins in 2022.
Design process
From the start of the process, the effort to design Our Home at Smokey Hollow centered around the question, “How Can We Make A Home?” Syracuse University said. The team researched the design for its project by first exploring how to create a healthy living environment for young adults on the autism spectrum. They referenced various case studies pertaining to buildings designed for people on the spectrum, met with parents to talk about what they felt would help their children transition into a new living space, and spoke to future residents to gain insight into their lifestyles.
Although the autism spectrum is “broad,” the design team was able to reach some general conclusions towards designing a comfortable living environment fit to support the residents, and decided on six main design impacts — net-zero, health and well-being, biophilic design, durability, efficiency, and sensory safe — that met all the specific requirements of the client and the intended occupants.
The team made efforts throughout the design process to move away from typical care-facility aesthetics and construct a more “inviting” place to live. By incorporating durable materials, both inside and out, they were able to create spaces that were “functional and attractive.”
Through the use of clerestory windows and a Trombe wall, the design also ensured that there was ample diffused daylight and passive heat during the winters. The team also focused on minimizing sensory overload — a major consideration in addressing ASD — by reducing visual stresses, decreasing background noises, and maintaining predictability throughout the building. And to give the space a more homelike feel, the team added a few unique design elements including a sensory room, where residents can retreat and engage in different activities outside their daily routine, and a greenhouse, which will allow residents to engage in horticultural therapy all year long.
With more than 144,000 people with autism spectrum disorder in New York state, and only a handful of assisted living communities, the team’s project is a “model that can be replicated throughout the Northeast and benefit people far beyond Baldwinsville,” Syracuse said.

EPA awards Cortland $16 million loan for water and sewer projects
CORTLAND — The City of Cortland will use a $16 million federal loan for sewer rehabilitation and water-main replacement projects. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on May 11 announced the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan. This WIFIA loan will help Cortland “protect public health and the environment by helping provide safe
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
CORTLAND — The City of Cortland will use a $16 million federal loan for sewer rehabilitation and water-main replacement projects.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on May 11 announced the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan.
This WIFIA loan will help Cortland “protect public health and the environment by helping provide safe drinking water and dependable wastewater services,” the EPA said.
This project will cost $38 million. EPA’s WIFIA loan will finance nearly half of that figure — up to $16 million. Additionally, a combination of loans and grants from the New York Clean Water State Revolving Fund, the New York Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, and other state funds will finance about $18 million, the EPA said.
The Federal Community Development Block Grant Program will fund $3.7 million, marking the first time that this U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funding program and WIFIA financing have been used together to support a project.
The WIFIA loan will save the City of Cortland an estimated $3.5 million compared to typical bond financing. Project construction and operation are expected to create 120 jobs, per the EPA.
“EPA is acting on its commitment to infrastructure investment by providing this important support to the City of Cortland. It will help the city finance critical sewer rehabilitation and water-main-replacement-related project costs,” Pete Lopez, administrator of the EPA’s Region 2, said in a release. “The City of Cortland serves as a key gateway in New York’s Southern Tier and this investment in water infrastructure will yield positive environmental results for years to come.”
About the project
The Clinton Avenue Gateway project will replace aged water mains, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage with a new water main, services, hydrants, and valves. The purpose of this project is to replace the existing infrastructure, which has exceeded its useful life. The existing water mains and sewer systems have been in place for over 100 years and are at risk of failure due to age and use. The project will provide proper water and sewer main separation, reduce treatment costs for water and wastewater, and improve public health and environmental protections, per the EPA.
“We thank the EPA for extending the WIFIA program to a city our size,” Cortland Mayor Brian Tobin said. “EPA’s participation opened a door for the City of Cortland to reconstruct its infrastructure, revitalize its commercial base and improved the quality of services rendered to our residents that the City would not be able to do on its own.”
About WIFIA
Established by the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014, the WIFIA program is a federal loan and guarantee program administered by EPA.
WIFIA’s seeks to accelerate investment in the nation’s water infrastructure by providing long-term and low-cost supplemental credit assistance for regionally and nationally significant projects.
The EPA says its WIFIA program plays an “important part” in President Trump’s infrastructure plan, which calls for expanding project eligibility. The WIFIA program has an “active pipeline” of pending applications for projects that will result in billions of dollars in water infrastructure investment and thousands of jobs.

Broome County IDA, City of Ithaca win $300K brownfield grants from EPA
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded the Broome County Industrial Development Agency (IDA) and the City of Ithaca $300,000 brownfield grants for specific projects in their respective areas. The local grants are part of more than $3 million in grants EPA made to New York organizations. A brownfield is a property for which
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded the Broome County Industrial Development Agency (IDA) and the City of Ithaca $300,000 brownfield grants for specific projects in their respective areas.
The local grants are part of more than $3 million in grants EPA made to New York organizations. A brownfield is a property for which “the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.”
The EPA estimates the U.S. has more than 450,000 brownfields.
The Broome County IDA will use a $300,000 brownfields-assessment grant targeting a former tannery and industrial waste dump, a prior shoe factory, and a former auto dealership in the Susquehanna Innovation Corridor, which includes the Village of Endicott, Village of Johnson City, and the Town of Union.
“The Agency is thrilled to receive the EPA’s Brownfield Communitywide Assessment Grant. We have a number of sites that serve only as a reminder of our post-industrial past. With the EPA’s program and utilization of these grant funds, we will reimagine our future,” Stacey Duncan, executive director of the Broome County Industrial Development Agency, said in an EPA news release.
The EPA has also selected the City of Ithaca for a $300,000 brownfields-assessment grant targeting sites located near Ithaca’s waterfront, including Inlet Island, Immaculate Conception School, the New York State Department of Transportation maintenance site, Carpenter Business Park, and the Taber Street Automobile Service property.
“Ithaca is thrilled to secure federal money from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to help redevelop potentially contaminated properties,” Ithaca Mayor Svante Myrick said. “This funding is critical, now more than ever, to help spur the local economy and create jobs.”
The Broome County IDA and the City of Ithaca will use their grant funds to identify sites for assessment, to assess sites for hazardous substances, to complete cleanup and reuse plans, and to carry out community outreach activities, the EPA said in its description of each entity’s grant.
EPA’s brownfields program began in 1995 and has provided nearly $1.6 billion in brownfield grants to assess and clean up contaminated properties and return blighted properties to productive reuse, the agency said.
To date, brownfields investments have leveraged more than $31 billion in cleanup and redevelopment, the EPA says.
New York offers over $24M for electric-bus subsidies
Funding is from state’s share of VW settlement money The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) recently announced that more than $24 million is now available to replace diesel-powered transit buses with new all-electric transit buses. Transit-bus replacements are targeted at New
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Funding is from state’s share of VW settlement money
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) recently announced that more than $24 million is now available to replace diesel-powered transit buses with new all-electric transit buses.
Transit-bus replacements are targeted at New York State government entity-owned bus fleets that have bus depots located within “potential environmental justice areas (PEJAs),” or operate routes that serve PEJA areas.
DEC defines PEJAs as communities of color or low-income communities that “experience a disproportionate share of environmental harms such as vehicle emissions and pollution.”
Centro, Broome County Transit, Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit, Chemung County (C Tran), and Clinton County Public Transportation are among 18 New York State government entities that are potentially eligible under the program, NYSERDA said.
Centro is “not pursuing electric buses at this time,” Steven Koegel, VP of communications and business planning at the organization, tells CNYBJ in a May 27 email.
The all-electric buses will “help improve air quality, reduce the greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change, and promote investment in cleaner fuel technologies, among other benefits,” the authority contends.
As part of the state’s $127.7 million allocation of the federal Volkswagen emissions settlement, NYSERDA will administer approximately $18.4 million to fund the new electric-transit buses through the New York Truck Voucher Incentive Program (NYTVIP) and the New York Power Authority (NYPA) will manage $6 million for associated charging infrastructure.
When asked if any of the agencies in Central New York had inquired about the funding, NYSERDA responded with this statement on May 27.
“NYSERDA’s New York Truck Voucher Incentive Program has seen interest from a number of transit agencies to replace diesel-powered buses with new all-electric buses, which will help improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the state. NYSERDA is unable to discuss specific applications under consideration but we have begun receiving them from agencies across the state including Central New York,” NYSERDA told CNYBJ in an email.
“The Truck Voucher Incentive Program enables us to support fleet owners in their efforts to add cleaner, more efficient trucks and buses…,” Alicia Barton, president and CEO of NYSERDA, said in a statement. “Supporting a statewide effort to increase the use of all-electric buses and ramping up electric vehicle charging stations gives fleet owners the confidence they need to go greener and cleaner with their vehicles and hastens our ability to ultimately eliminate New York State’s carbon footprint.”
Use of funding
Funding is available to replace existing diesel-powered transit buses with model year 2009 and older engines, which must be “permanently removed from service and scrapped,” NYSERDA said.
The transit-bus replacement funds will be administered through NYSERDA’s NYTVIP, which provides point-of-sale rebates to reduce the cost for businesses and municipalities that want to purchase new, clean electric or alternative-fueled vehicles (such as commercial trucks and buses). The rebate will initially reduce the incremental cost of purchasing all-electric transit buses by up to 100 percent and help increase the number of all-electric transit buses on New York’s roadways while removing older diesel-powered vehicles trucks through a scrappage requirement.
These new all-electric transit buses will be required to be housed at bus depots or operate on routes located within “environmental justice” communities, NYSERDA said.
Clean Transportation NY
At the direction of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the DEC, NYSERDA, NYPA, the New York State Department of Transportation (DOT), Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and others, developed Clean Transportation NY.
Clean Transportation NY is New York’s plan to “strategically invest the Volkswagen settlement resources for maximum benefit and to build on New York’s national leadership on clean energy and climate change.”
The funds were secured to “mitigate damages” from the Volkswagen emissions-cheating scandal through the federal settlement with Volkswagen. The state’s investment of settlement funds is expected to result in at least $300 million of clean vehicles and infrastructure on New York’s roadways, per NYSERDA.
The transportation sector is currently the largest source of greenhouse-gas emissions in New York, representing about 34 percent of the state’s total emissions.

Bodi Energy gets $560K state grant to retool for COVID-19 respirator-mask production
ITHACA — An Ithaca energy company known for developing technologies for electric-vehicle batteries is using a state grant to retool its facility for N95 respirator-mask production. Empire State Development (ESD) on May 15 announced it has awarded Bodi Energy $560,000. It’s part of more than $4 million that ESD awarded to eight New York state companies
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
ITHACA — An Ithaca energy company known for developing technologies for electric-vehicle batteries is using a state grant to retool its facility for N95 respirator-mask production.
Empire State Development (ESD) on May 15 announced it has awarded Bodi Energy $560,000. It’s part of more than $4 million that ESD awarded to eight New York state companies to produce needed testing supplies and personal protective equipment (PPE) related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The firms can utilize the funding to retool their business lines and pivot to manufacturing supplies for ongoing response and recovery efforts.
Bodi Energy is using its award to adjust its facility for the N95 respirator-mask production. The firm normally specializes in “non-flammable electrolyte [systems] for lithium-ion batteries.”
The Bodi project will involve a $3 million investment, which supports a team of 14 full-time employees and a manufacturing capacity of 60,000 masks per day, or 15 million masks per year.
Bodi’s masks will use a patented Cornell University technology “expected to deliver a superior particle capture efficiency at lower pressure drop than conventional melt-blown fibers and set a new standard of novel air filtration that allows for N99 and N100 ratings with significantly better breathability and comfort,” per an ESD news release.
The ramp-up process will include the purchase of machinery and equipment, training of employees, and setup and configuration of the manufacturing line.
The effort seeks to fast track the masks for National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification over the next few months, ESD said.
Eric Donsky is CEO and co-founder of Bodi Energy. The other co-founder is Yong Lak Joo.

Over 300 N.Y. communities have earned Clean Energy Community designation
More than 300 communities across the state have earned designation as a “Clean Energy Community,” completing more than 1,700 total “high-impact,” clean-energy actions. The label recognizes community leadership in reducing energy use, cutting costs, and driving clean energy, according to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA). More than 570 communities are
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
More than 300 communities across the state have earned designation as a “Clean Energy Community,” completing more than 1,700 total “high-impact,” clean-energy actions.
The label recognizes community leadership in reducing energy use, cutting costs, and driving clean energy, according to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA).
More than 570 communities are participating in the Clean Energy Communities initiative and have completed at least one high-impact action, the authority announced on May 26.
Launched by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in August 2016, the $16 million Clean Energy Communities initiative, which NYSERDA administers, supports local governments across the state by providing grants to eligible municipalities to implement energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable-development projects in their communities.
Overall, more than 1,700 high-impact, clean-energy actions were completed by communities representing more than 91 percent of the state’s population in 61 counties and all 10 Economic Development Council regions.
Under the Clean Energy Communities program, cities, counties, towns, and villages that are designated as Clean Energy Communities were eligible to apply for funding of up to $250,000 to finance additional clean energy projects. Areas with fewer than 40,000 residents were eligible to apply for up to $100,000 in funding.
Grants, which have historically been provided through the clean-energy fund and the regional greenhouse-gas initiative, are “fully exhausted at this time.”
NYSERDA said it expects to release a new update to the Clean Energy Communities program in the coming months to provide communities new opportunities for grants and recognition while “driving the next level of impact.”
Clean-energy projects
Statewide, clean-energy projects that communities have completed include installation of nearly 1,000 electric-vehicle charging ports.
In addition, 100 cities, towns, and villages across New York have converted about 290,000 streetlights to light-emitting diode (LED) lighting.
At the same time, more than 630 electric vehicles deployed as part of clean municipal fleets, 930 code officers and other municipal officials completed energy-code-enforcement training, and 342 communities adopted the New York State Unified Solar Permit.

Destiny USA asks state to reconsider decision keeping malls shut in phase 2
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Destiny USA’s owner says it hopes New York State will reconsider its “surprising” decision to not allow enclosed shopping centers to open
Employers Should Review the Content of their COBRA Notices Now
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued revised model COBRA notices on May 1. The revised notices add information regarding the interaction between Medicare and COBRA and are intended to assist Medicare-eligible qualified beneficiaries when making health-care coverage decisions. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic downturn, many employers have been (or will
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued revised model COBRA notices on May 1. The revised notices add information regarding the interaction between Medicare and COBRA and are intended to assist Medicare-eligible qualified beneficiaries when making health-care coverage decisions.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic downturn, many employers have been (or will be) forced to reduce the hours of or terminate large segments of their workforces. In these circumstances, plan administrators typically will be required to notify qualified beneficiaries of their COBRA rights due to a loss of eligibility under the terms of the applicable group health plan.
Recently, there has been an increase in litigation asserting that such COBRA notices are deficient. Many of these lawsuits allege that the COBRA notices provided by plan administrators either did not include all of the necessary information as required by the COBRA regulations or included misleading or inaccurate information. Employers considering adopting the newly issued model COBRA notices may also want to review the content of their current notices to ensure they are compliant.
Background
Employers are required to provide qualified beneficiaries (employees and their families who may elect COBRA continuation coverage upon a qualifying event like an employee termination) with certain notices explaining their rights under COBRA. The general notice (also referred to as the initial notice), and the election notice are the two primary notices that communicate COBRA rights.
Employers must provide the general notice to each qualified beneficiary at the time coverage starts under the group health plan. The general notice communicates to the plan participants their COBRA rights and obligations.
Additionally, a plan administrator must, upon a qualifying event occurring, furnish an election notice to each qualified beneficiary who loses health-plan coverage in connection with the qualifying event. The election notice informs the qualified beneficiaries of their rights to COBRA continuation coverage and how to make an election.
The DOL provides model general and election notices that may be used by plan administrators. The recently revised versions of these notices inform qualified beneficiaries who did not enroll in Medicare Part A or B when first eligible because they were still employed that they have an eight-month special-enrollment period beginning on the earlier of the month after employment ends, or the month after group health-plan coverage based on current employment ends, to sign up for Medicare Part A or B. Additionally, the revised notices inform qualified beneficiaries who elect COBRA continuation coverage and who do not enroll in Medicare Part B that should the qualified beneficiary decide to enroll in Medicare Part B at a later date there may be a late enrollment penalty and gap in coverage. The notices also include the following new information: (1) as a general rule, if a qualified beneficiary is enrolled in both COBRA and Medicare, then Medicare will pay first (i.e., be the primary payer) and COBRA will pay second; and (2) if a qualified beneficiary elects COBRA continuation coverage and later enrolls in Medicare Part A or B before the COBRA continuation coverage ends, the group health plan may terminate the qualified beneficiary’s continuation coverage.
While this is useful information for qualified beneficiaries who are Medicare-eligible or may become Medicare-eligible during the COBRA period, it is interesting to note that the new notices were issued just one day after the publication of an IRS and DOL joint notice that temporarily extended COBRA election and premium-payment deadlines. These extended COBRA deadlines were summarized in a previous information memo available at: https://www.bsk.com/news-insights/us-department-of-labor-issues-guidance-on-employee-benefits-and-covid-19-outbreak. Notably, the model COBRA notices were not revised to include any information regarding the extended deadlines. This is an area where additional guidance for plan administrators would be welcome.
The newly revised model notices as well as FAQs from the DOL regarding the model notices is available at: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/laws-and-regulations/laws/cobra.
COBRA Litigation
The FAQs and model notices reiterate that the appropriate use of the model notices by plan administrators (i.e., plan administrators must fill in the blanks with the appropriate plan information) is deemed by the DOL to be good-faith compliance with the notice-content requirements of COBRA.
However, in recent years, there has been an uptick in the number of lawsuits filed alleging that COBRA notices issued by plan administrators were deficient. As many employers have been forced to reduce their workforce due to COVID-19, this litigation trend will likely continue. Failure to provide a correct and accurate COBRA notice can result in a court awarding statutory penalties of up to $110 per day, as well as other fees and costs as the court deems proper.
In light of the newly issued model notices, the uptick in COBRA-notice litigation and the economic conditions increasing the likelihood of COBRA qualifying events occurring, we believe it is a good time for employers to review their current COBRA notices, and update them accordingly.
Daniel J. Nugent is an associate attorney in the Syracuse office of Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC. He works in the firm’s employee benefits and executive compensation practice area. Contact him at dnugent@bsk.com. This viewpoint article is drawn from a May 26 information memo posted on the law firm’s website.
We lead the world in decrepit buildings & it will get worse
Many visiting Europeans are stunned by the huge number of derelict and otherwise empty buildings we have in the U.S. Most of our cities show signs of manufacturing blight. Especially Northern and Rust Belt cities. In this state, a city does not qualify as a city unless it can show several shuttered factories, an empty
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Many visiting Europeans are stunned by the huge number of derelict and otherwise empty buildings we have in the U.S.
Most of our cities show signs of manufacturing blight. Especially Northern and Rust Belt cities. In this state, a city does not qualify as a city unless it can show several shuttered factories, an empty mall, vacant store fronts, office buildings half-empty, and maybe an armory.
Many of our small towns suffer the same blight with old school buildings and industrial carcasses. Upstate New Yorkers have grown up with the sight of them. To them they are as much a part of the landscape as maple trees.
European visitors are shocked by the same sight. This is because Europeans do not have enough spare space to allow this. They cannot afford it. So they knock down or re-use old buildings. We, on the other hand, are rich enough to leave the bodies where they collapsed. The upstate village where I graduated high school is still home to the remains of a factory that failed in the 1930’s.
We are in the midst of adding to the body count of unused buildings. Before the coronavirus struck, we were losing shopping malls. One big bank predicted we will lose 25 percent of our malls by 2022. About 9,000 stores closed last year. Many were in malls.
The virus will surely steepen the decline. Victoria’s Secret announced it will close about 250 stores in the U.S. and Canada. Already shaky Macy’s reported that its sales fell 45 percent. Bell-ringers are warming up the muffled bells. JCPenney and J. Crew have filed for bankruptcy. Lord & Taylor is looking at liquidation. Neiman Marcus is bankrupt. Nordstrom is closing 15 stores.
Meanwhile, small businesses are vacating downtown and mini-malls. Many colleges and universities are shrinking because the pool of available students has shrunk. Some may go under.
Office buildings in cities are somewhat empty, because so many office workers are lately home workers. Facebook, Google and Microsoft say most of their workers will work from home until 2021. I have to believe many companies will simply occupy less office space in the future. How are you going to lure them back to the office, after they have seen home-cooked lunch?
Don’t forget movie theaters. They are dark now because of the virus. Many will never reopen. They were already edging toward the abyss. The virus is jettisoning them into it.
Old-line churches have struggled for years. This virus may have people on their knees. But the praying has been at home. Some churches will perish.
The country will see thousands of clinics, shops, florists and mom and pops of all types close. Wait, they are closed now, you say. Thousands will not reopen.
Local governments will take similar measures. My county is cutting $1 million from its modest budget. It is closing one of its DMV offices.
My point is that this country is going to look like a cemetery for deceased buildings. Even when the economy grows healthy again. And I believe it will. We knew more of our economy would go online down the road. The virus has brought the road to us. Down the road is no longer down.
We are accustomed to seeing empty shops on Main Street. And empty factories here and there. And the odd shuttered shopping mall. Well, the view from the highway is not likely to improve.
Tom Morgan writes about political, financial, and other subjects from his home in upstate New York. Write Tom at tomasinmorgan@yahoo.com or read more of his writing at tomasinmorgan.com.
Exceptional? Only If We Get to Work
Like most Americans, I have always considered the United States an exceptional country. We possess a political system built on checks and balances, an ideal of giving voice to ordinary people across a diverse land, and a Constitution that favors finding common ground among them. Our economy, at its best, offers opportunity, rewards innovation, and
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Like most Americans, I have always considered the United States an exceptional country. We possess a political system built on checks and balances, an ideal of giving voice to ordinary people across a diverse land, and a Constitution that favors finding common ground among them. Our economy, at its best, offers opportunity, rewards innovation, and makes it possible for people from humble circumstances to succeed and thrive. Our civic spirit, despite hiccups and political conflict, has over the long haul pointed us toward tolerance, broadening civil rights, and encouraging participation from the neighborhood to Capitol Hill.
Recently, there has been a spate of public musing about “the end of American exceptionalism.” This is not new: conservatives have been lamenting our “decline” for years, while there are significant portions of the population for whom the promise of America never quite became real. But the coronavirus has laid bare a country fumbling for a response; a federal government that, despite pockets of brilliance, has failed overall to protect and offer guidance to Americans; a health-care system that has been forced to scramble for the most basic supplies; and an economic downturn that has wreaked disproportionate havoc on the lives of middle-class and wage-earning Americans.
Yet even before this crisis, there was reason to question whether the U.S. truly is exceptional. This is worth spending some time on, because in the coming months of this election year you will no doubt hear grandiose claims about the U.S.’s virtues. They demand an honest accounting of where we excel and where we fall short.
Let’s take a quick tour. In education, for instance, the OECD ranked the U.S. as sixth most-educated in 2018; Canada came in first place. We do even worse on student test scores for reading, math, and science, where the U.S. in 2018 ranked 36th in math and 17th in reading. There was a time when our infrastructure was the envy of the world. Now it’s Singapore, the Netherlands, and Hong Kong; we’re not even in the top 10. In health care, World Population Review ranks us 37th. On a broad ranking of quality of life — that is, which countries offer the best chances for a healthy, safe, and prosperous life ahead — you’d want to be in Denmark, Switzerland, or Finland; on the Bloomberg “Healthiest Country” index, the U.S. didn’t make the top 20. In fact, in a separate look at life expectancy in the 36 OECD countries, we rank 29th.
Which country is perceived as having the most advanced technology? Japan (placed 4th). Where is democracy strongest? The Economist Intelligence Unit, measuring the state of democracy in 167 countries, put Norway and Iceland at the top, with the U.S. coming in 25th. Which country is viewed as possessing the most stable economy? Switzerland, Canada, and Germany top US News & World Report’s list. The U.S. comes in 15th. To be sure, on various indexes of military strength, we rank first in the world. But then, we also rank highest among the G7 nations for income inequality.
I don’t want to make your eyes glaze over with numbers. And, in fact, the measures I cited might not be the ones you would pick. Feel free to go online and search for “country rankings by…” whatever you’re curious about. What you’ll find is a mixed picture of the U.S., quite apart from anything caused by the pandemic. It didn’t rob us of our “exceptional” status. We’ve been doing that all on our own for years.
Not long ago, the writer Fintan O’Toole had a widely read piece in which he said, “However bad things are for most other rich democracies, it is hard not to feel sorry for Americans.” When I read articles like that, I think they miss a key point. I don’t feel sorry for us. Because what I said at the beginning of this commentary still holds true: our political system, our economic potential, and our civic spirit remain the cornerstones of a great nation.
We have a choice. We can continue to lose ground globally. But if we choose to build and strive to reach our potential, we can become, without doubt, truly exceptional again.
Lee Hamilton, 89, is a senior advisor for the Indiana University (IU) Center on Representative Government, distinguished scholar at IU Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, and professor of practice at the IU O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Hamilton, a Democrat, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years (1965-1999), representing a district in south central Indiana.
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.